These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Two independent evaluations of ten amalgam alloys. Osborne JW; Leinfelder KF; Gale EN; Sluder TB J Prosthet Dent; 1980 Jun; 43(6):622-6. PubMed ID: 6989979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A 30-month clinical evaluation of the influence of finishing and size of restoration on the margin performance of five amalgam alloys. Birtcil RF; Pelzner RB; Stark MM J Dent Res; 1981 Dec; 60(12):1949-56. PubMed ID: 7028822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Linear dimensional change of copper-rich dental amalgam. Paffenbarger GC; Rupp NW; Patel PR J Am Dent Assoc; 1979 Sep; 99(3):468-71. PubMed ID: 288781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of surface treatment on marginal integrity of amalgam restorations (in vitro study). Kamel FM Egypt Dent J; 1995 Jul; 41(3):1313-20. PubMed ID: 9497675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Zinc-containing high copper amalgams: a 3-year clinical evaluation. Osborne JW; Berry TG Am J Dent; 1992 Feb; 5(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 1524742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relationship of restoration width, tooth position, and alloy to fracture at the margins of 13- to 14-year-old amalgams. Osborne JW; Gale EN J Dent Res; 1990 Sep; 69(9):1599-601. PubMed ID: 2398187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Initial mercury evaporation from amalgams made with in-containing commercial alloys. Nakajima H; Lorenzana E; Ferracane JL; Okabe T Dent Mater J; 1996 Dec; 15(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 9550014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]