These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6992590)

  • 1. Retentive shear strengths of various bonding attachment bases.
    Lopez JI
    Am J Orthod; 1980 Jun; 77(6):669-78. PubMed ID: 6992590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Shear strength of orthodontic direct-bonding adhesives.
    Johnson WT; Hembree JH; Weber FN
    Am J Orthod; 1976 Nov; 70(5):559-66. PubMed ID: 790973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bond strengths of two integral bracket-base combinations: an in vitro comparison with foil-mesh.
    Regan D; van Noort R
    Eur J Orthod; 1989 May; 11(2):144-53. PubMed ID: 2670589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Shear bond strengths of ceramic brackets bonded with different light-cured glass ionomer cements: an in vitro study.
    Cacciafesta V; Süssenberger U; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Miethke RR
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Apr; 20(2):177-87. PubMed ID: 9633171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variables influencing the bond strength of metal orthodontic bracket bases.
    Maijer R; Smith DC
    Am J Orthod; 1981 Jan; 79(1):20-34. PubMed ID: 6450539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adhesion of mesh-base direct-bonding brackets.
    Thanos CE; Munholland T; Caputo AA
    Am J Orthod; 1979 Apr; 75(4):421-30. PubMed ID: 285618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shear bond strength of brackets bonded to amalgam with different intermediate resins and adhesives.
    Germec D; Cakan U; Ozdemir FI; Arun T; Cakan M
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 19073953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shear bond strengths of a selenium containing and a conventional light cured adhesive for orthodontic bonding.
    Machicek SL; McGrory KR; English JD; Stephens CR; Ellis RK; Colville CD; Powers JM; Ontiveros JC; Akyalcin S
    Tex Dent J; 2011 Dec; 128(12):1261-7. PubMed ID: 22375444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of saliva and water contamination on the enamel shear bond strength of a light-cured glass ionomer cement.
    Cacciafesta V; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Süssenberger U; Miethke RR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Apr; 113(4):402-7. PubMed ID: 9563355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of saliva on shear bond strengths of hydrophilic bonding systems.
    Webster MJ; Nanda RS; Duncanson MG; Khajotia SS; Sinha PK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 11174540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tensile and shear bond strengths of orthodontic direct-bonding adhesives.
    Yamada T; Smith DC; Maijer R
    Dent Mater; 1988 Oct; 4(5):243-50. PubMed ID: 3073988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Shear bond strengths of molar tubes bonded with different adhesives.
    Chapman JL; Coreil MN; Armbruster PC; Du JX
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 19634456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does ozone water affect the bond strengths of orthodontic brackets?
    Pithon MM; dos Santos RL
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 20575204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shear, torsional, and tensile bond strengths of ceramic brackets using three adhesive filler concentrations.
    Ostertag AJ; Dhuru VB; Ferguson DJ; Meyer RA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Sep; 100(3):251-8. PubMed ID: 1877551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bonding bases coated with porous metal powder: a comparison with foil mesh.
    Hanson GH; Gibbon WM; Shimizu H
    Am J Orthod; 1983 Jan; 83(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 6336902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bond strength of ceramic brackets under shear stress: an in vitro report.
    Viazis AD; Cavanaugh G; Bevis RR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Sep; 98(3):214-21. PubMed ID: 2144942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An in vitro comparison of four surface preparation techniques for veneering a compomer to stainless steel.
    Salama FS; el-Mallakh BF
    Pediatr Dent; 1997; 19(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 9200199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of self-etching primer and adhesive formulations on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
    Cehreli ZC; Kecik D; Kocadereli I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 May; 127(5):573-9; quiz 625-6. PubMed ID: 15877037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to various esthetic pontic materials.
    Maryanchik I; Brendlinger EJ; Fallis DW; Vandewalle KS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):684-9. PubMed ID: 20451789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The crystal growth technique--a laboratory evaluation of bond strengths.
    Jones SP; Gledhill JR; Davies EH
    Eur J Orthod; 1999 Feb; 21(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 10191582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.