These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Leaded shields for thyroid dose reduction in intraoral dental radiography. Whitcher BL; Gratt BM; Sickles EA Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1979 Dec; 48(6):567-70. PubMed ID: 292963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of device position on the operator's radiation dose when using a handheld portable X-ray device. Makdissi J; Pawar RR; Johnson B; Chong BS Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(3):20150245. PubMed ID: 26764582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiation exposure to angiographer during coronary arteriography using the U arm image amplifier. Begg FR; Hans LF Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1975; 1(3):261-5. PubMed ID: 1222422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Personal dosimetry for interventional operators: when and how should monitoring be done? Martin CJ Br J Radiol; 2011 Jul; 84(1003):639-48. PubMed ID: 21159809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reduction of scatter radiation during transradial percutaneous coronary angiography: a randomized trial using a lead-free radiation shield. Politi L; Biondi-Zoccai G; Nocetti L; Costi T; Monopoli D; Rossi R; Sgura F; Modena MG; Sangiorgi GM Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Jan; 79(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 21520391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of a suspended radiation protection system to reduce operator exposure in cardiology interventional procedures. Zanca F; Dabin J; Collard C; Alexandre N; De Groote A; Salembier JP; Henry M; Rombaut E; Sghaier S; Massart PE Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Nov; 98(5):E687-E694. PubMed ID: 34347935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fluoroscopic radiation exposure: are we protecting ourselves adequately? Hoffler CE; Ilyas AM J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 May; 97(9):721-5. PubMed ID: 25948518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. EFFICACY OF AN ADDITIONAL MOBILE LEADED SHIELD ON OPERATOR RADIATION DURING PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY. Luçon A; Ghrairi A; Lecoq G; Idali M; Huret B; Richard P; Morelle JF Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Apr; 173(4):389-394. PubMed ID: 26940441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Decreasing operators' radiation exposure during coronary procedures: the transradial radiation protection board. Behan M; Haworth P; Colley P; Brittain M; Hince A; Clarke M; Ghuran A; Saha M; Hildick-Smith D Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Jul; 76(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 20578091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Randomized Controlled Trial of Radiation Protection With a Patient Lead Shield and a Novel, Nonlead Surgical Cap for Operators Performing Coronary Angiography or Intervention. Alazzoni A; Gordon CL; Syed J; Natarajan MK; Rokoss M; Schwalm JD; Mehta SR; Sheth T; Valettas N; Velianou J; Pandie S; Al Khdair D; Tsang M; Meeks B; Colbran K; Waller E; Fu Lee S; Marsden T; Jolly SS Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 8(8):e002384. PubMed ID: 26253734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Types and arrangement of thyroid shields to reduce exposure of surgeons to ionizing radiation during intraoperative use of C-arm fluoroscopy. Lee SY; Min E; Bae J; Chung CY; Lee KM; Kwon SS; Park MS; Lee K Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(24):2108-12. PubMed ID: 23963017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Elevated Radiation Exposure Associated With Above Surface Flat Detector Mini C-Arm Use. Martin DP; Chapman T; Williamson C; Tinsley B; Ilyas AM; Wang ML Hand (N Y); 2019 Jul; 14(4):565-569. PubMed ID: 29166785 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomized study comparing the use of a pelvic lead shield during trans-radial interventions: Threefold decrease in radiation to the operator but double exposure to the patient. Musallam A; Volis I; Dadaev S; Abergel E; Soni A; Yalonetsky S; Kerner A; Roguin A Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jun; 85(7):1164-70. PubMed ID: 25510441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of radiation dose to operator between transradial and transfemoral coronary angiography with optimised radiation protection: a phantom study. Liu H; Jin Z; Jing L Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Mar; 158(4):412-20. PubMed ID: 24162374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness of pelvic lead blanket to reduce the doses to eye lens and hands of interventional cardiologists and assistant nurses. Grabowicz W; Domienik-Andrzejewska J; Masiarek K; Górnik T; Grycewicz T; Brodecki M; Lubiński A J Radiol Prot; 2017 Sep; 37(3):715-727. PubMed ID: 28631620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective case control comparison of the ZeroGravity system versus a standard lead apron as radiation protection strategy in neuroendovascular procedures. Haussen DC; Van Der Bom IM; Nogueira RG J Neurointerv Surg; 2016 Oct; 8(10):1052-5. PubMed ID: 26491039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiation exposure and protection in cardiac catheterization laboratories. Miller SW; Castronovo FP Am J Cardiol; 1985 Jan; 55(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 3966378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy of a radiation absorbing shield in reducing dose to the interventionalist during peripheral endovascular procedures: a single centre pilot study. Power S; Mirza M; Thakorlal A; Ganai B; Gavagan LD; Given MF; Lee MJ Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2015 Jun; 38(3):573-8. PubMed ID: 25280954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]