These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Abdominal incisions: techniques and postoperative complications. Burger JW; van 't Riet M; Jeekel J Scand J Surg; 2002; 91(4):315-21. PubMed ID: 12558078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Suture length to wound length ratio and healing of midline laparotomy incisions. Israelsson LA; Jonsson T Br J Surg; 1993 Oct; 80(10):1284-6. PubMed ID: 8242299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Towards no incisional hernias: lateral paramedian versus midline incisions. Cox PJ; Ausobsky JR; Ellis H; Pollock AV J R Soc Med; 1986 Dec; 79(12):711-2. PubMed ID: 3543347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Incisional hernia after upper abdominal surgery: a randomised controlled trial of midline versus transverse incision. Halm JA; Lip H; Schmitz PI; Jeekel J Hernia; 2009 Jun; 13(3):275-80. PubMed ID: 19259615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Abdominal incisions--vertical or transverse? Ellis H; Coleridge-Smith PD; Joyce AD Postgrad Med J; 1984 Jun; 60(704):407-10. PubMed ID: 6462980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Midline or transverse laparotomy? A random controlled clinical trial. Part I: Influence on healing. Greenall MJ; Evans M; Pollock AV Br J Surg; 1980 Mar; 67(3):188-90. PubMed ID: 6988033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Natural history of vertical abdominal parietal closure: Prolene versus Dexon. Lewis RT; Wiegand FM Can J Surg; 1989 May; 32(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 2540896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Circumumbilical versus transumbilical abdominal incision. Paes TR; Stoker DL; Ng T; Morecroft J Br J Surg; 1987 Sep; 74(9):822-4. PubMed ID: 3311285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of stitch length on wound complications after closure of midline incisions: a randomized controlled trial. Millbourn D; Cengiz Y; Israelsson LA Arch Surg; 2009 Nov; 144(11):1056-9. PubMed ID: 19917943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does mass closure of midline laparotomies stand the test of time? A random control clinical trial. Ausobsky JR; Evans M; Pollock AV Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1985 May; 67(3):159-61. PubMed ID: 3159324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Closure of midline laparotomy incisions with polydioxanone and nylon: the importance of suture technique. Israelsson LA; Jonsson T Br J Surg; 1994 Nov; 81(11):1606-8. PubMed ID: 7827883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ventral hernia and other complications of 1,000 midline incisions. Carlson MA; Ludwig KA; Condon RE South Med J; 1995 Apr; 88(4):450-3. PubMed ID: 7716599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors involved in abdominal wall closure and subsequent incisional hernia. O'Dwyer PJ; Courtney CA Surgeon; 2003 Feb; 1(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 15568420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The lateral paramedian: revisiting a forgotten incision. Hughes K; Selim NM Am Surg; 2009 Apr; 75(4):321-3. PubMed ID: 19385293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Continuous double loop closure for midline laparotomy wounds. Nasir GA; Baker KK Saudi Med J; 2001 Apr; 22(4):351-4. PubMed ID: 11331495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does the type of suture material contribute to the strength of the lateral paramedian incision? Donaldson DR; Hall TJ; Zoltowski JA; Guillou PJ; Brennan TG Br J Surg; 1982 Mar; 69(3):163-5. PubMed ID: 6279223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]