These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6993437)

  • 1. Abdominal hysterectomy: comparison of closed cuff, open cuff, and staple closure techniques.
    Wolf D
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1980 Jun; 79(10):625-31. PubMed ID: 6993437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vaginal cuff closure at abdominal hysterectomy: comparing sutures with absorbable staples.
    Stovall TG; Summitt RL; Lipscomb GH; Ling FW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):415-8. PubMed ID: 1876376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Abdominal hysterectomy without internal peritonealization: primary vaginal closure with stapler or open and drained vagina].
    Nagele F; Kurz C; Husslein P
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1994 Apr; 54(4):228-32. PubMed ID: 8013858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the open and closed cuff method of vaginal dome closure in total abdominal hysterectomy.
    Rochowiak MW
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1980 Mar; 79(7):472-8. PubMed ID: 6987199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bacterial contamination at abdominal hysterectomy: a comparison of staple closure with regular suture closure of the vaginal wall.
    Beresford JM; MacKenzie AM
    J Gynecol Surg; 1991; 7(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 10149785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new method of continuous vaginal cuff closure at abdominal hysterectomy.
    Berman ML; Grosen EA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Sep; 84(3):478-80. PubMed ID: 8058253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vaginal cuff closure at abdominal hysterectomy: comparing sutures with absorbable staples.
    Martens MG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Feb; 79(2):311-3. PubMed ID: 1731304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Contemporary views on perioperative complications and adhaesion formation after vaginal hysterectomy, in relation to peritoneal closure vs. non-closure in combination with open vs. closed vaginal cuff].
    Watrowski R; Friebe Z
    Ginekol Pol; 2006 Dec; 77(12):973-9. PubMed ID: 17373125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Automatic suture stapling in abdominal hysterectomy].
    Bendvold E; Dahl OE; Havig O
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1986 Jan; 106(3):199. PubMed ID: 3513367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Morcellation laparoscopic hysterectomy of the CASH (Classical, Abdominal, Semm, Hysterectomy) type].
    Rosales Delgado JA; González-Sicilia Cotter E; González Vergara R; Aedo Ocaña O
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1994 Dec; 62():378-80. PubMed ID: 7835735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unusual complications following abdominal hysterectomy: dyspareunia and consort glans laceration after vaginal cuff stapling.
    Zerner J; Miller BA; Nelson BD
    J Maine Med Assoc; 1980 Jun; 71(6):169-70, 73. PubMed ID: 6993594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vaginal cuff closure with abdominal hysterectomy. A new approach.
    Watson T
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Nov; 39(11):903-7. PubMed ID: 7853283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of closure of subcutaneous tissue versus non-closure in relation to wound disruption after abdominal hysterectomy in obese patients.
    Kore S; Vyavaharkar M; Akolekar R; Toke A; Ambiye V
    J Postgrad Med; 2000; 46(1):26-8. PubMed ID: 10855074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The use of an automatic stapler in abdominal hysterectomies. Our experience].
    Rosaschino P; Palmerio G; Zambetti E; Gambarini A
    Minerva Ginecol; 1995 Apr; 47(4):143-6. PubMed ID: 7644095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transvaginal evisceration after hysterectomy: is vaginal cuff closure associated with a reduced risk?
    Iaco PD; Ceccaroni M; Alboni C; Roset B; Sansovini M; D'Alessandro L; Pignotti E; Aloysio DD
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Mar; 125(1):134-8. PubMed ID: 16154253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Use of mechanical apparatus for suturing in gynecology].
    Donchev A
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1980; 19(4):374-7. PubMed ID: 6998314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surgical treatment of endometrial cancer: does closure or non-closure of the vagina affect the local recurrence rate?
    Kohlberger P; Nowotny G; Speiser P; Joura E; Sliutz G; Hefler L; Reinthaller A
    Anticancer Res; 2007; 27(3B):1589-91. PubMed ID: 17595780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A prospective comparison of abdominal hysterectomy using absorbable staples.
    Beresford JM; Moher D
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1993 Jun; 176(6):555-8. PubMed ID: 8322128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does vaginal cuff closure decrease the infectious morbidity associated with abdominal hysterectomy?
    Korn AP; Grullon K; Hessol N; Lin P; Siopak J
    J Am Coll Surg; 1997 Oct; 185(4):404-7. PubMed ID: 9328390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Experience with the use of a mechanical suture in supravaginal amputation of the uterus].
    Gladun EV
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1979 Feb; (2):26-8. PubMed ID: 371432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.