BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6994003)

  • 1. Prevention of abdominal wound disruption utilizing the Smead-Jones closure technique.
    Wallace D; Hernandez W; Schlaerth JB; Nalick RN; Morrow CP
    Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Aug; 56(2):226-30. PubMed ID: 6994003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modified midline abdominal wound closure technique in complicated/high risk laparotomies.
    Murtaza B; Ali Khan N; Sharif MA; Malik IB; Mahmood A
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2010 Jan; 20(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 20141691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Results of the Smead-Jones technique of closure of vertical midline incisions for emergency laparotomies--a prospective study of 403 patients.
    Sivam NS; Suresh S; Hadke MS; Kate V; Ananthakrishnan N
    Trop Gastroenterol; 1995; 16(4):62-7. PubMed ID: 8854960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Layered and mass sutures in the closure of median laparotomies].
    Tocchi A; Liotta G; Mazzoni G; Lepre L; Costa G; Agostini N; Tomei B; Miccini M; Giuliani A
    G Chir; 2000; 21(11-12):463-8. PubMed ID: 11227149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Abdominal wound disruption.
    Baggish MS; Lee WK
    Obstet Gynecol; 1975 Nov; 46(5):530-4. PubMed ID: 1105274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Continuous double loop closure for midline laparotomy wounds.
    Nasir GA; Baker KK
    Saudi Med J; 2001 Apr; 22(4):351-4. PubMed ID: 11331495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Abdominal wound closure using a running, looped monofilament polybutester suture: comparison to Smead-Jones closure in historic controls.
    Sutton G; Morgan S
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Oct; 80(4):650-4. PubMed ID: 1407889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A simple mass-closure technique compared with layered technique in the closure of high-risk abdominal wounds.
    Shittu OS; Ifenne DI; Ekwempu CC
    West Afr J Med; 1995; 14(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 7626526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extrafascial wound dehiscence: deep en bloc closure versus superficial skin closure.
    Dodson MK; Magann EF; Sullivan DL; Meeks GR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jan; 83(1):142-5. PubMed ID: 8272296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abdominal wound closure using a nonabsorbable single-layer technique.
    Shepherd JH; Cavanagh D; Riggs D; Praphat H; Wisniewski BJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Feb; 61(2):248-52. PubMed ID: 6337356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of closure of subcutaneous tissue versus non-closure in relation to wound disruption after abdominal hysterectomy in obese patients.
    Kore S; Vyavaharkar M; Akolekar R; Toke A; Ambiye V
    J Postgrad Med; 2000; 46(1):26-8. PubMed ID: 10855074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mass closure versus layer closure of abdominal wound: a prospective clinical study.
    Chowdhury SK; Choudhury SD
    J Indian Med Assoc; 1994 Jul; 92(7):229-32. PubMed ID: 7963604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Closure of the abdominal wall; how and why? Clinical review.
    Wadström J; Gerdin B
    Acta Chir Scand; 1990 Jan; 156(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 2181798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A prospective study of closure techniques of abdominal incisions in infants and children.
    Chana RS; Saxena VC; Agarwal A
    J Indian Med Assoc; 1993 Mar; 91(3):59-61. PubMed ID: 8350001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Burst abdomen and incisional hernia after major gastrointestinal operations--comparison of three closure techniques.
    Gislason H; Grønbech JE; Søreide O
    Eur J Surg; 1995 May; 161(5):349-54. PubMed ID: 7662780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. No more abdominal wound dehiscences.
    Stokes TL; Old L
    Va Med Mon (1918); 1969 Sep; 96(9):506-13 passim. PubMed ID: 4899832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abdominal wound closure.
    Carlson DC; Wornom IL; Aldrete JS
    Ala J Med Sci; 1984 Jan; 21(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 6367517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Burst abdomen. A preventable complication, monolayer closure of the abdominal incision with monofilament nylon.
    Mathur SK
    J Postgrad Med; 1983 Oct; 29(4):223-9. PubMed ID: 6368809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anatomic staple closure of midline incision of the upper part of the abdomen.
    Sapala JA; Brown TE; Sapala MA
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1986 Sep; 163(3):282-4. PubMed ID: 2944237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical factors influencing the incidence of burst abdomen.
    Niggebrugge AH; Hansen BE; Trimbos JB; van de Velde CJ; Zwaveling A
    Eur J Surg; 1995 Sep; 161(9):655-61. PubMed ID: 8541424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.