154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6995147)
1. The impact of restricting Medicaid financing for abortion.
Trussell J; Menken J; Lindheim BL; Vaughan B
Fam Plann Perspect; 1980; 12(3):120-3, 127-30. PubMed ID: 6995147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Abortion in the United States, 1977-1978.
Forrest JD; Sullivan E; Tietze C
Fam Plann Perspect; 1979; 11(6):329-41. PubMed ID: 401078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions.
Haas-Wilson D
J Policy Anal Manage; 1993; 12(3):498-511. PubMed ID: 10127357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. After the Hyde Amendment: public funding for abortion in FY 1978.
Gold RB
Fam Plann Perspect; 1980; 12(3):131-4. PubMed ID: 6995148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Publicly funded abortions in FY 1980 and FY 1981.
Gold RB
Fam Plann Perspect; 1982; 14(4):204-7. PubMed ID: 6811313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Medicaid cutoff and abortion services for the poor.
Henshaw SK; Wallisch LS
Fam Plann Perspect; 1984; 16(4):171-2, 177-80. PubMed ID: 6386517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trends in rates of live births and abortions following state restrictions on public funding of abortion.
Korenbrot CC; Brindis C; Priddy F
Public Health Rep; 1990; 105(6):555-62. PubMed ID: 2124355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. States rebel against Federal abortion orders.
Kent C; Tokarski C
J Am Health Policy; 1994; 4(2):6-7. PubMed ID: 10132602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Hyde Amendment and the future.
Rosoff JI
Fam Plann Perspect; 1980; 12(4):172. PubMed ID: 7002585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Public funding for contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1994.
Sollom T; Gold RB; Saul R
Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(4):166-73. PubMed ID: 8853282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Controversy over abortion funding increases.
Hosp Prog; 1980 Mar; 61(3):32. PubMed ID: 10297698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of publicly funded contraceptive services on unintended pregnancies and implications for Medicaid expenditures.
Forrest JD; Samara R
Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(5):188-95. PubMed ID: 8886761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The courts and elective abortions under Medicaid.
Mendelson JE; Domolky S
Soc Serv Rev; 1980 Mar; 54(1):124-34. PubMed ID: 10297796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 80 percent of Americans believe abortion should be legal; 70 percent approve Medicaid Funding.
Fam Plann Perspect; 1979; 11(3):189-90. PubMed ID: 383496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors hindering access to abortion services.
Henshaw SK
Fam Plann Perspect; 1995; 27(2):54-9, 87. PubMed ID: 7796896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Women's reproductive choices: the impact of Medicaid funding restrictions.
Haas-Wilson D
Fam Plann Perspect; 1997; 29(5):228-33. PubMed ID: 9323500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Abortion debate continues: a look at laws, regulations, restrictions and funding.
Smith JA
Calif Nurse; 1980 Jun; 76(1):8. PubMed ID: 6991059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The fiscal impact of the Medicaid abortion funding ban in Michigan.
Evans MI; Gleicher E; Feingold E; Johnson MP; Sokol RJ
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 82(4 Pt 1):555-60. PubMed ID: 8135922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A preliminary investigation of the effects of restrictions on Medicaid funding for abortions on female STD rates.
Sen B
Health Econ; 2003 Jun; 12(6):453-64. PubMed ID: 12759915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Recent developments in the health care area.
Harper TD; Berg RN
J Med Assoc Ga; 1980 Sep; 69(9):785-7. PubMed ID: 7191438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
