These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. The development of an augmentation endodontic-endosseous implant and a technique for its use: a postoperative evaluation. Curcio FB J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Jan; 51(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 6366200 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Root-form implant placements within the posterior mandible: a surgical approach. Shepherd NJ Dent Implantol Update; 1994 Nov; 5(11):85-8. PubMed ID: 9525133 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Shape memory effect on Ti-base Ti-V-Fe-Al alloys. Possibility to apply for dental implant. Kimura H; Sohmura T J Osaka Univ Dent Sch; 1985 Dec; 25():7-16. PubMed ID: 3914537 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. A new implant design: a tripod with optimalisation of stress distribution on bone. II. Practical usage. Sweijd F Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol; 1979 Oct; 22(4):129-33. PubMed ID: 395979 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Modified mandibular complete denture as an interim implant-supported, cement-retained prosthesis: a clinical technique. Wat PY; Chow JK; Chu FC; Chow TW Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Mar; 9(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 17362491 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Some rationale for the use of the screw as an endosseous implant. Warriner JF J Oral Implantol; 1978; 8(1):108-23. PubMed ID: 385897 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [Histological study of peri-implant tissues. Intraosseous implants in surgical chromium-cobalt molybdenum]. Fonseca MM; David OJ; Ferreyra FJ Rev Fac Odontol Univ Nac (Cordoba); 1988; 16(1-2):27-36. PubMed ID: 3274259 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Simulated tissue using a unique pontic design: a clinical report. Kim TH; Cascione D; Knezevic A J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):205-10. PubMed ID: 19782821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Fixed-removable dentures on hydroxyapatite implants using a device for paralleling the pins]. Mangnao C; Denissen HW; Venini G Dent Cadmos; 1983 Jul; 51(7):39-49. PubMed ID: 6381117 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses. Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Intrasurgical implant position transfer and interim restoration placement. Sava CN; Kamposiora P; Papavasiliou G; Orfanou AV J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):648-53. PubMed ID: 18798785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The relationship between endosteal implant design and function: maximum stress distribution with computer-formed, three dimensional Flexi-Cup blades. Valen M J Oral Implantol; 1983; 11(1):49-71. PubMed ID: 6368845 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Tooth position in full-mouth implant restorations--a case report. Piermatti J Gen Dent; 2006; 54(3):209-13; quiz 214, 221-2. PubMed ID: 16776416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The Core-Vent implant system. The evolution of an osseoventegrated implant. Niznick GA Implantologist; 1983-1984; 3(1):34-46. PubMed ID: 6386668 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Treatment planning of implants in posterior quadrants. Jivraj S; Chee W Br Dent J; 2006 Jul; 201(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 16829878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]