These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6995507)

  • 1. Neutron activation analysis of microleakage around a hydrophobic composite restorative.
    Douglas WH; Chen CJ; Craig RG
    J Dent Res; 1980 Sep; 59(9):1507-10. PubMed ID: 6995507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new composite restorative based on a hydrophobic matrix.
    Douglas WH; Craig RG; Chen CJ
    J Dent Res; 1979 Oct; 58(10):1981-6. PubMed ID: 291622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rebonding as a method of controlling marginal microleakage in composite resin restorations.
    Judes H; Eli I; Lieberman R; Serebro L; Ben Amar A
    N Y J Dent; 1982 May; 52(5):137-43. PubMed ID: 6212785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microleakage of composite and two types of glass ionomer restorations with saliva contamination at different steps.
    Farmer SN; Ludlow SW; Donaldson ME; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A
    Pediatr Dent; 2014; 36(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 24717701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An in-vivo comparison of microleakage of composite resins placed with and without dentin bonding material.
    Lanning GE; Cochran MA; Swartz ML
    J Indiana Dent Assoc; 1987; 66(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 2951509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Polymerization shrinkage of experimental short glass fiber-reinforced composite with semi-inter penetrating polymer network matrix.
    Garoushi S; Vallittu PK; Watts DC; Lassila LV
    Dent Mater; 2008 Feb; 24(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 17531311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Polymerization stress related to radiant exposure and its effect on microleakage of composite restorations.
    Calheiros FC; Sadek FT; Boaro LC; Braga RR
    J Dent; 2007 Dec; 35(12):946-52. PubMed ID: 17961901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of different drying methods for single step adhesive systems on microleakage of tooth colored restorations.
    Owens BM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2003 Feb; 4(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 12595929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro microleakage of dentin adhesives.
    Sorensen JA; Dixit NV; White SN; Avera SP
    Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(3):213-8. PubMed ID: 1725698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repair of amalgam restorations with composite resin and bonded amalgam: a microleakage study.
    Popoff DA; Gonçalves FS; Magalhães CS; Moreira AN; Ferreira RC; Mjör IA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):799-803. PubMed ID: 22484874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microleakage of composite resin restorations in cervical cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser radiation.
    Shahabi S; Ebrahimpour L; Walsh LJ
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Jun; 53(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 18494974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents.
    Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 11572288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bonding ability of light cured composite resin to enamel and dentin promoted by various bonding systems--microleakage and bond strength studies.
    Torii Y; Iwami Y; Kato R; Imazato S; Torii M; Tsuchitani Y
    J Osaka Univ Dent Sch; 1990 Dec; 30():72-7. PubMed ID: 2151822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term deterioration of composite resin and amalgam restorations.
    Smales RJ
    Oper Dent; 1991; 16(6):202-9. PubMed ID: 1840079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of surface sealants on marginal microleakage in Class V resin composite restorations.
    Silva Santana SV; Bombana AC; Flório FM; Basting RT
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(6):397-404. PubMed ID: 20002927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microleakage of a condensable resin composite: an in vitro investigation.
    Tung FF; Estafan D; Scherer W
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Jun; 31(6):430-4. PubMed ID: 11203962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surface failure of commercial and experimental restorative resins.
    Powers JM; Roberts JC; Craig RG
    J Dent Res; 1976; 55(3):432-6. PubMed ID: 1063753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
    Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The initial gap around large composite restorations in vitro: the effect of etching enamel walls.
    Brännström M; Torstenson B; Nordenvall KJ
    J Dent Res; 1984 May; 63(5):681-4. PubMed ID: 6231320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.