These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6996402)
1. The presence of mast cells in IUD smears. A preliminary report. Kobayashi TK; Okamoto H; Harami K; Yuasa M Acta Cytol; 1980; 24(3):268-9. PubMed ID: 6996402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The cells from intrauterine contraceptive devices: with special reference to the occurrence of mast cells. Kobayashi TK; Fujimoto T; Okamoto H; Harami K; Yuasa M Acta Cytol; 1982; 26(5):614-7. PubMed ID: 6756003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception. Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Possible role of mast cells in the mechanism of action of intrauterine contraceptive devices. Tursi A; Mastrorilli A; Ribatti D; Loiudice L; Contino R; Claudatus J Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Apr; 148(8):1064-6. PubMed ID: 6711640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cytopathologic changes associated with intrauterine contraceptive devices. A review of cervico-vaginal smears in 350 women. Pillay B; Gregory AR; Subbiah M Med J Malaysia; 1994 Mar; 49(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 8057995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The decline in popularity of the intrauterine device. A survey of general practitioner attitudes and practices in New South Wales. Weisberg E; Fraser IS; Goss S Med J Aust; 1994 Jan; 160(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 8271978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The effect of intrauterine contraceptive devices on the endometrium]. Sheppard BL; Bonnar J Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1987 Nov; 15(11):1015-24. PubMed ID: 12341565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pelvic actinomycosis associated with use of intrauterine device: a new challenge for the surgeon. Doberneck RC Am Surg; 1982 Jan; 48(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 7065552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Actinomycosis and IUDs. Duguid HL IPPF Med Bull; 1983 Jun; 17(3):1-2. PubMed ID: 12279410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Incidence of actinomycosis associated with intrauterine devices. Chatwani A; Amin-Hanjani S J Reprod Med; 1994 Aug; 39(8):585-7. PubMed ID: 7996521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Statement on intrauterine devices (IUDs). International Planned Parenthood Federation IPPF. International Medical Advisory Panel IMAP IPPF Med Bull; 1987 Dec; 21(6):3-5. PubMed ID: 12268853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Intrauterine devices: reactions of the endometrium and alteration of the devices after varying time of exposure in situ (author's transl)]. Ludwig H Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol; 1980; 64():523-35. PubMed ID: 7013339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Cervix and vaginal cytology in IUD prophylaxis]. Grumbrecht C Gynakol Rundsch; 1981; 21(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 7250771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cytologic and histologic findings in women using an IUD. Risse EK; Beerthuizen RJ; Vooijs GP Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Nov; 58(5):569-73. PubMed ID: 7301231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prevalence of cervical neoplasia and infection in women using intrauterine contraceptive devices. Blenkinsopp WK; Chapman P J Reprod Med; 1982 Nov; 27(11):709-13. PubMed ID: 7153984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]