These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6996484)

  • 1. Studies on the distribution of abnormal cells in cytologic preparations. III. Making the smear with a plastic spatula.
    Rubio CA; Berglund K; Kock Y; Zetterberg A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Aug; 137(7):843-6. PubMed ID: 6996484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Studies of the distribution of abnormal cells in cytologic preparations. I. Making the smear with a wooden spatula.
    Rubio CA; Kock Y; Berglund K
    Acta Cytol; 1980; 24(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 6928335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Studies on the distribution of abnormal cells in cytological smears. VII. Cervical brush versus plastic and wooden spatulas.
    Rubio CA; Kock Y; Stormby N; Porwit A
    Gynecol Oncol; 1990 Nov; 39(2):167-70. PubMed ID: 2227590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Studies on the distribution of abnormal cells in cytologic preparations. V. The gradient of cell deposition on slides.
    Rubio CA; Kock Y
    Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Jun; 57(6):754-8. PubMed ID: 7231829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Studies on the distribution of abnormal cells in cytologic preparations. VI. Pressure exerted by the gynecologist during smearing.
    Rubio CA; Stormby N; Kock Y; Thomassen P
    Gynecol Oncol; 1983 Jun; 15(3):391-5. PubMed ID: 6683215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The false negative smear. II. The trapping effect of collecting instruments.
    Rubio CA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1977 May; 49(5):576-80. PubMed ID: 850573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Studies on the distribution of abnormal cells in cytologic preparations. IV. Importance of the topographical position of the cells in material collected by wooden spatulas.
    Rubio CA; Berglund K; Kock Y
    Gynecol Oncol; 1980 Oct; 10(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 7007176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Studies on the distribution of abnormal cells in cytological preparations II. Making the smear with the cotton swab applicator.
    Rubio CA; Kock Y; Berglund K; Thomassen P
    Gynecol Oncol; 1980 Apr; 9(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 7189498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Collection devices for cervicovaginal cytology: a comparison.
    Dighe S; Ajit D
    Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(4):416-20. PubMed ID: 16124171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Paired cervical smears: a method of reducing the false-negative rate in population screening.
    Beilby JO; Bourne R; Guillebaud J; Steele ST
    Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Jul; 60(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 7088450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of spatula and nonspatula methods for cervical sampling.
    Rammou-Kinia R; Anagnostopoulou I; Gomousa M
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 1994638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy of cotton-tipped applicators for obtaining cells from the uterine cervix for Papanicolaou smears.
    Shen JT; Nalick RH; Schlaerth JB; Morrow CP
    Acta Cytol; 1984; 28(5):541-5. PubMed ID: 6592916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic accuracy of squamous cervical lesions studied in spatula-cytobrush smears.
    Alons-van Kordelaar JJ; Boon ME
    Acta Cytol; 1988; 32(6):801-4. PubMed ID: 3059733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The extended tip spatula for cervical cytology.
    Colón VF; Linz LE
    J Fam Pract; 1981 Jul; 13(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 7252437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of five sampling methods for the preparation of cervical smears.
    Boon ME; de Graaff Guilloud JC; Rietveld WJ
    Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):843-8. PubMed ID: 2588917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison between Siriraj liquid-based and conventional cytology for detection of abnormal cervicovaginal smears: a split-sample study.
    Laiwejpithaya S; Rattanachaiyanont M; Benjapibal M; Khuakoonratt N; Boriboonhirunsarn D; Laiwejpithaya S; Sangkarat S; Wongtiraporn W
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2008; 9(4):575-80. PubMed ID: 19256741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatula/cytobrush vs. spatula/cotton swab detection of cervical condylomatous lesions.
    Selvaggi SM
    J Reprod Med; 1989 Sep; 34(9):629-33. PubMed ID: 2810246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effectiveness and safety of two cervical cytologic techniques during pregnancy.
    Stillson T; Knight AL; Elswick RK
    J Fam Pract; 1997 Aug; 45(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 9267375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomized clinical trial comparing the Cytobrush and cotton swab for Papanicolaou smears.
    Koonings PP; Dickinson K; d'Ablaing G; Schlaerth JB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Aug; 80(2):241-5. PubMed ID: 1635737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficacy of the cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells.
    Kristensen GB; Hølund B; Grinsted P
    Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):849-51. PubMed ID: 2588918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.