These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6997011)

  • 1. [The abrasion of composites in the region of the lateral teeth--results after 3 years].
    Roulet JF; Mettler P; Friedrich U
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1980 Apr; 35(4):493-7. PubMed ID: 6997011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The abrasion of amalgam and composites in the lateral dental region].
    Roulet JF; Mettler P; Friedrich U
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1978 Mar; 33(3):206-9. PubMed ID: 274270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The abrasion of amalgam and composites in the area of the lateral teeth].
    Mettler P; Friedrich U; Roulet JF
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1978 Apr; 88(4):324-44. PubMed ID: 349684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Abrasion measurements in vivo in occlusal composite and amalgam fillings].
    Meier C; Lutz F
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1978 Sep; 33(9):617-22. PubMed ID: 279445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparative in vivo wear-resistance measurements between amalgam and composite materials. Results after 2 years].
    Meier C; Lutz F
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1980 Apr; 35(4):489-92. PubMed ID: 6931810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Effects of different class II cavity designs on stresses in restoration].
    Xu X; Sun Z; Tao L; Xiong H
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Nov; 37(6):446-8. PubMed ID: 12641960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Re-intervention in glass ionomer restorations: what comes next?
    Burke FJ; Lucarotti PS
    J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 18819740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [A long-term study of amalgam and composite fillings].
    Pieper K; Meyer G; Marienhagen B; Motsch A
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Mar; 46(3):222-5. PubMed ID: 1814726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of Class II combined amalgam-composite restorations in primary molars after 6 to 30 months.
    Holan G; Chosack A; Eidelman E
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1996; 63(5):341-5. PubMed ID: 8958346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Repair of non-carious amalgam margin defects.
    Roberts HW; Charlton DG; Murchison DF
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):273-6. PubMed ID: 11357570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Strain profiles in molars restored with posterior composite resins: effect of cavity size & restorative technique.
    Kamel FM; Bides MW; Leinfelder KF
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Jul; 41(3):1327-33. PubMed ID: 9497677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Re-treatment decisions for failed posterior fillings by Finnish general practitioners.
    Heinikainen M; Vehkalahti M; Murtomaa H
    Community Dent Health; 2002 Jun; 19(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 12146589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Newer Class I cavity preparation for permanent teeth using air abrasion and composite restoration.
    Ferdianakis K; White GE
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(3):201-16. PubMed ID: 10686867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical aspects of restorative treatment in the primary dentition.
    Varpio M
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1993; 96():1-47. PubMed ID: 8310420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of a packable resin composite, conventional resin composite and amalgam on molar cuspal stiffness.
    Molinaro JD; Diefenderfer KE; Strother JM
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):516-24. PubMed ID: 12216572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of direct cuspal coverage with posterior composite resin restorations.
    Deliperi S; Bardwell DN
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2006; 18(5):256-65; discussion 266-7. PubMed ID: 16987320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Inspection of 1 to 5-year-old amalgam, composite, and cast gold fillings].
    Hammer B; Hotz P
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1979 Apr; 89(4):301-14. PubMed ID: 390699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Amalgam. IX. Substitute for amalgam: durability of composite restorations].
    Schuurs AH; van Amerongen JP
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1993 Oct; 100(10):437-41. PubMed ID: 11822139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.