These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6999012)

  • 1. Use of the API 20E system to identify veterinary Enterobacteriaceae.
    Swanson EC; Collins MT
    J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Jul; 12(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 6999012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of the API 20E system to identify non-Enterobacteriaceae from veterinary medical sources.
    Collins MT; Swanson EC
    Am J Vet Res; 1981 Jul; 42(7):1269-73. PubMed ID: 7023301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of API 20E System and Encise Enterotube for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae of animal origin.
    Devenish JA; Barnum DA
    Can J Comp Med; 1980 Jul; 44(3):315-9. PubMed ID: 7000321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rapid and automated identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the abbott MS-2 system and API-20E versus conventional methods.
    Izard D; Savage C; Enayeh E; Leclerc H; Troonen H
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 May; 252(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 6750982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reevaluation of the API 20E identification system versus conventional biochemicals for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae: a new look at an old product.
    O'Hara CM; Rhoden DL; Miller JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Jan; 30(1):123-5. PubMed ID: 1734043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the repliscan system for Enterobacteriaceae identification.
    Woolfrey BF; Quall CO; Fox JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Jan; 13(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 7007430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the API rapid E four-hour system with the API 20E overnight system for the identification of routine clinical isolates of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
    Overman TL; Plumley D; Overman SB; Goodman NL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Apr; 21(4):542-5. PubMed ID: 3886691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of micro-ID and API 20E in rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Gooch WM; Hill GA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 May; 15(5):885-90. PubMed ID: 7047556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlation studies of entero-set 20, API 20E and conventional media systems for Enterobacteriaceae identification.
    Aldridge KE; Hodges RL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Jan; 13(1):120-5. PubMed ID: 7007414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the four-hour rapid 20E system for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
    Izard D; Husson MO; Vincent P; Leclerc H; Monget D; Boeufgras JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Jul; 20(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 6378967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative evaluation of the Eiken and API 20E systems and conventional methods for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
    Castillo CB; Bruckner DA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Oct; 20(4):754-7. PubMed ID: 6490860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simplified scheme for identification of prompt lactose-fermenting members of the Enterobacteriaceae.
    Hicks MJ; Ryan KJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1976 Dec; 4(6):511-4. PubMed ID: 794078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the BBL Crystal Enteric/Nonfermenter kit for the identification of water-derived environmental Enterobacteriaceae.
    Micklewright IJ; Sartory DP
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 1995 Sep; 21(3):160-3. PubMed ID: 7576500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using SIB and API kits to identify and biotype enterobacteria of different origin.
    Kulinich LI; Fish NG; Mazitova OP; Dratvin SA; Birger MO
    J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol; 1987; 31(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 3316379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical laboratory evaluation of the automicrobic system Enterobacteriaceae biochemical card.
    Davis JR; Stager CE; Wende RD; Qadri SM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Oct; 14(4):370-5. PubMed ID: 7026606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of three methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Appelbaum PC; Arthur RR; Parker ME; Shugar GL; von Kuster LC; Charache P
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Apr; 1(2):76-81. PubMed ID: 6756905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative study of three methods of identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Rutherford I; Moody V; Gavan TL; Ayers LW; Taylor DL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1977 Apr; 5(4):458-64. PubMed ID: 323287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the DMS Rapid E system for identification of clinical isolates of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
    Keville MW; Doern GV
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Nov; 20(5):1010-1. PubMed ID: 6392317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the Microbact-12E and 24E systems and the API-20E system for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Mugg P; Hill A
    J Hyg (Lond); 1981 Oct; 87(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 7026673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the Micro-ID, the API 20E and the Rapid 20E for same-day identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Appelbaum PC; Jacobs MR; Buick MK; Flanagan MM; Gymer GA
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Oct; 4(5):498-501. PubMed ID: 3905400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.