These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6999147)

  • 1. Postsurgical bone loss following root planing by ultrasonic and hard instruments.
    Glick DH; Freeman E
    J Periodontol; 1980 Sep; 51(9):510-2. PubMed ID: 6999147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effectiveness of the Titan-S sonic scaler versus curettes in the removal of subgingival calculus. A human surgical evaluation.
    Gellin RG; Miller MC; Javed T; Engler WO; Mishkin DJ
    J Periodontol; 1986 Nov; 57(11):672-80. PubMed ID: 3550033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of root surface microtopography following the use of four instrumentation systems by confocal microscopy and scanning electron microscopy: an in vitro study.
    Solís Moreno C; Santos A; Nart J; Levi P; Velásquez A; Sanz Moliner J
    J Periodontal Res; 2012 Oct; 47(5):608-15. PubMed ID: 22494068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Root planing and curettage.
    Ramfjord SP
    Int Dent J; 1980 Jun; 30(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 6997216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of root surface instrumentation using two piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers and a hand scaler in vivo.
    Kawashima H; Sato S; Kishida M; Ito K
    J Periodontal Res; 2007 Feb; 42(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 17214645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Study of the influence of different instruments for removing dental deposits on tooth surface].
    Kuchumova ED; Stiuf IaV
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2006; 85(6):27-30. PubMed ID: 17310945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative clinical responses related to the use of various periodontal instrumentation.
    Obeid PR; D'Hoore W; Bercy P
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 15016023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The treatment of uncoated and titanium nitride-coated abutments with different instruments.
    Mengel R; Meer C; Flores-de-Jacoby L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 15101595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scanning electron microscope evaluation of wear of dental curettes during standardized root planing.
    Tal H; Panno JM; Vaidyanathan TK
    J Periodontol; 1985 Sep; 56(9):532-6. PubMed ID: 3897505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Determination of the time it takes to do scaling and root planing by ultrasonic instruments, the effect of the sharpness of the tips, the effect of these tips on the cement and the effectiveness of the ultrasonic instruments made in Turkey].
    Kandemir S; Ilgenli T
    Ankara Univ Hekim Fak Derg; 1988 Sep; 15(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 3078147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hand instrumentation versus ultrasonics in the removal of endotoxins from root surfaces.
    Nishimine D; O'Leary TJ
    J Periodontol; 1979 Jul; 50(7):345-9. PubMed ID: 381632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effectiveness of hand versus ultrasonic instrumentation in open flap root planing.
    Hunter RK; O'Leary TJ; Kafrawy AH
    J Periodontol; 1984 Dec; 55(12):697-703. PubMed ID: 6394737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hand versus ultrasonic instrumentation in the removal of endotoxins from root surfaces in vitro.
    Checchi L; Pelliccioni GA
    J Periodontol; 1988 Jun; 59(6):398-402. PubMed ID: 3292754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical attachment loss produced by curettes and ultrasonic scalers.
    Alves RV; Machion L; Casati MZ; Nociti FH; Sallum EA; Sallum AW
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 Jul; 32(7):691-4. PubMed ID: 15966872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative effectiveness of ultrasonic and hand scaling for the removal of subgingival plaque and calculus.
    Breininger DR; O'Leary TJ; Blumenshine RV
    J Periodontol; 1987 Jan; 58(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 3543285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accessibility of an ultrasonic furcation tip to furcation areas of mandibular first and second molars.
    Sugaya T; Kawanami M; Kato H
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2002 Oct; 4(4):132-7. PubMed ID: 12670093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of an air-powder abrasive system on root surfaces in periodontal surgery.
    Horning GM; Cobb CM; Killoy WJ
    J Clin Periodontol; 1987 Apr; 14(4):213-20. PubMed ID: 3294915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of postsurgical healing following debridement by ultrasonic or hand instruments.
    Walsh TF; Waite IM
    J Periodontol; 1978 Apr; 49(4):201-5. PubMed ID: 353249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of research on scaling and root planing.
    O'Leary TJ
    J Periodontol; 1986 Feb; 57(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 3514839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Root instrumentation. Power-driven versus manual scalers, which one?
    Drisko CH
    Dent Clin North Am; 1998 Apr; 42(2):229-44. PubMed ID: 9597335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.