These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6999792)
1. [Identification of Chlamydia trachomatis in cell culture (author's transl)]. Mösinger-Lundgren V; Petzoldt D Zentralbl Bakteriol A; 1980; 246(4):555-61. PubMed ID: 6999792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Chlamydial cervicitis: role of culture, enzyme immunoassay and Giemsa cytology in diagnosis. Mittal A; Kapur S; Gupta S APMIS; 1993 Jan; 101(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 8457324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis inclusions in McCoy and HeLa-229 cells: an alternative staining technique using toluidine blue. Mohammed NR; Hillary IB J Clin Pathol; 1984 Jun; 37(6):682-5. PubMed ID: 6202722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The microbiological analysis of cervix smears of prostitutes with special reference to Ureaplasma and Chlamydia]. Grossgebauer K; Nürnberger F; Schwarz E Offentl Gesundheitswes; 1983 Jan; 45(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 6219315 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Chlamydia trachomatis: detection using a direct test and culture in 100 genital specimens]. Dutilh B; Bebear C Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1985; 43(3):275-8. PubMed ID: 3896054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Chlamydia trachomatis in routine cervical smears. A microscopic and ultrastructural analysis. Henry MR; de Mesy Jensen KL; Skoglund CD; Armstrong DW Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(3):343-52. PubMed ID: 8388608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sensitivity of detecting Chlamydia trachomatis elementary bodies in smears by use of a fluorescein labelled monoclonal antibody: comparison with conventional chlamydial isolation. Thomas BJ; Evans RT; Hawkins DA; Taylor-Robinson D J Clin Pathol; 1984 Jul; 37(7):812-6. PubMed ID: 6205023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in prostitutes working in a brothel in Izmir]. Ertem E; Dereli D; Serter D; Ergin O Mikrobiyol Bul; 1993 Oct; 27(4):335-7. PubMed ID: 8264446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Results of attempted isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis in 2,000 specimens (author's transl)]. Ardoin P; Pradier T; Edlinger E Sem Hop; 1982 Jun; 58(24):1477-9. PubMed ID: 6287614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved method for isolation and growth of Chlamydia trachomatis in McCoy cells treated with cycloheximide using polyethylene glycol. Mohammed NR; Hillary IB J Clin Pathol; 1985 Sep; 38(9):1052-4. PubMed ID: 3900144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Detection of chlamydia trachomatis in urine, vulval and cervical swabs]. Bakken IJ; Bratt H; Skjeldestad FE; Nordbø SA Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2005 Jun; 125(12):1629-30. PubMed ID: 15976824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in routine clinical practice: increased sensitivity of cell culture in comparison with the microimmunofluorescence test]. Sterzik K; Rosenbusch B; Danner B; Heeg KM; Wolf A; Lauritzen C Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1988 Dec; 48(12):881-3. PubMed ID: 3069566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of the sensitivity of immunofluorescence and Giemsa for staining Chlamydia trachomatis inclusions in cycloheximide-treated McCoy cells. Munday PE; Johnson AP; Thomas BJ; Taylor-Robinson D J Clin Pathol; 1980 Feb; 33(2):177-9. PubMed ID: 6988463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Study on vertical transmission of Chlamydia trachomatis using PCR and DNA sequencing. Wu S; Shen L; Liu G Chin Med J (Engl); 1999 May; 112(5):396-9. PubMed ID: 11593506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Chlamydia trachomatis--epidemiologic data from the outpatient department of obstetrics/gynecology of the University of Tübingen/Germany]. Hoyme UB Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1983 Jun; 43(6):363-5. PubMed ID: 6554208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of proposed cytomorphologic criteria for the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis in Papanicolaou smears. Bernal JN; Martinez MA; Dabancens A Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 2728785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparative evaluation of various direct and culture methods for the diagnosis of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections]. Martelli P; Crovatto M; Gava G; Chiaradia V; Santini G Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1986 Mar; 22(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 3538126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Demonstration of different endocervical staining methods and their usefulness in the diagnosis of the chlamydial infection in exfoliated cells advantages and disadvantages. Mahmutović S; Beslagić E; Hamzić S; Aljicević M Bosn J Basic Med Sci; 2004 Feb; 4(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 15628979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sensitivity of mitomycin-C treated McCoy cells for isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis from genital specimens. Woodland RM; Kirton RP; Darougar S Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1987 Dec; 6(6):653-6. PubMed ID: 3126059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The value of symptoms and clinical findings in cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection]. Nher H; Lamminger C; Zimmermann J; Petzoldt D Hautarzt; 1991 Nov; 42(11):687-91. PubMed ID: 1769832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]