These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7000321)

  • 1. Evaluation of API 20E System and Encise Enterotube for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae of animal origin.
    Devenish JA; Barnum DA
    Can J Comp Med; 1980 Jul; 44(3):315-9. PubMed ID: 7000321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of two commerical methods for the identification of the Enterobacteriaceae--API 20E and the Enterotube--with conventional methods.
    Hayek LJ; Willis GW
    J Clin Pathol; 1976 Feb; 29(2):158-61. PubMed ID: 777035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rapid and automated identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the abbott MS-2 system and API-20E versus conventional methods.
    Izard D; Savage C; Enayeh E; Leclerc H; Troonen H
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 May; 252(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 6750982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the Micro-ID system (author's transl)].
    Peuckert W; Pelz K
    Zentralbl Bakteriol A; 1980 Aug; 247(3):323-32. PubMed ID: 6999799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laboratory evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Freeman JW; Rowland RW; Overman SB; Goodman NL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 May; 13(5):895-8. PubMed ID: 7016913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of six systems for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Mastroeni P; Carbone M; Fera MT; Teti G
    G Batteriol Virol Immunol; 1983; 76(1-6):3-19. PubMed ID: 6383930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical comparison of the enterotube II and API 20E systems for bacterial identification.
    Leighton PM; Little JA
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1983 Mar; 79(3):367-70. PubMed ID: 6338701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical laboratory evaluation of the further improved Enterotube and Encise II.
    Isenberg HD; Scherber JS; Cosgrove JO
    J Clin Microbiol; 1976 Aug; 2(2):139-41. PubMed ID: 786999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using SIB and API kits to identify and biotype enterobacteria of different origin.
    Kulinich LI; Fish NG; Mazitova OP; Dratvin SA; Birger MO
    J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol; 1987; 31(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 3316379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the DMS Rapid E system for identification of clinical isolates of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
    Keville MW; Doern GV
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Nov; 20(5):1010-1. PubMed ID: 6392317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the Micro-ID, the API 20E and the Rapid 20E for same-day identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Appelbaum PC; Jacobs MR; Buick MK; Flanagan MM; Gymer GA
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Oct; 4(5):498-501. PubMed ID: 3905400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of the API 20E system to identify veterinary Enterobacteriaceae.
    Swanson EC; Collins MT
    J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Jul; 12(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 6999012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reevaluation of the API 20E identification system versus conventional biochemicals for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae: a new look at an old product.
    O'Hara CM; Rhoden DL; Miller JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Jan; 30(1):123-5. PubMed ID: 1734043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the enterotube system for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
    Martin WJ; Yu PK; Washington JA
    Appl Microbiol; 1971 Jul; 22(1):96-9. PubMed ID: 4939124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of the API 20E system to identify non-Enterobacteriaceae from veterinary medical sources.
    Collins MT; Swanson EC
    Am J Vet Res; 1981 Jul; 42(7):1269-73. PubMed ID: 7023301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identification of the Enterobacteriaceae: a comparison of the Enterotube II with the API 20E.
    Hayek LJ; Willis GW
    J Clin Pathol; 1984 Mar; 37(3):344-7. PubMed ID: 6365981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the automicrobic system with API, enterotube, micro-ID, micro-media systems, and conventional methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Kelly MT; Latimer JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Nov; 12(5):659-62. PubMed ID: 7024296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparative evaluation of 3 miniaturized systems (API 20E, Enterotube II, Sensititre AP60) commonly used in clinical microbiology laboratories].
    Chiaradia V; Pistello M; Pascoli L; Tarabini Castellani G; Beduz R; Menin A; Santini G
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1983 Jun; 19(2):159-75. PubMed ID: 6374735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the Microbact-12E and 24E systems and the API-20E system for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Mugg P; Hill A
    J Hyg (Lond); 1981 Oct; 87(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 7026673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Micro-ID and API 20E systems for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Blazevic DJ; Mackay DL; Warwood NM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1979 May; 9(5):605-8. PubMed ID: 383748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.