BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7000690)

  • 1. The influence of cigarette tobacco smoke products on the immune response. The cellular basis of immunosuppression by a water-soluble condensate of tobacco smoke.
    Jacob CV; Stelzer GT; Wallace JH
    Immunology; 1980 Aug; 40(4):621-7. PubMed ID: 7000690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modulation of immune response by bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS): multifocal effects of LPS-induced suppression of the primary antibody response to a T-dependent antigen.
    Uchiyama T; Jacobs DM
    J Immunol; 1978 Dec; 121(6):2340-6. PubMed ID: 363944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Restoration of in vitro immune responsiveness of mastocytoma-suppressed splenocytes by activated T cells.
    Kamo I; Patel C; Patel N; Friedman H
    J Immunol; 1975 Aug; 115(2):382-6. PubMed ID: 807635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of cigarette smoke on immune response: chronic exposure to cigarette smoke impairs antigen-mediated signaling in T cells and depletes IP3-sensitive Ca(2+) stores.
    Kalra R; Singh SP; Savage SM; Finch GL; Sopori ML
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 2000 Apr; 293(1):166-71. PubMed ID: 10734166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lipopolysaccharide-induced suppression of the primary immune response to a thymus-dependent antigen.
    Persson U
    J Immunol; 1977 Mar; 118(3):789-96. PubMed ID: 15030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Heterologous antibody responses in mice with chronic T. cruzi infection: depressed T helper function restored with supernatants containing interleukin 2.
    Reed SG; Inverso JA; Roters SB
    J Immunol; 1984 Sep; 133(3):1558-63. PubMed ID: 6235290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Studies on the adjuvant effect of Bordetella pertussis vaccine to sheep erythrocytes in the mouse. I. In vitro enhancement of antibody formation with normal spleen cells.
    Murgo AJ; Athanassiades TJ
    J Immunol; 1975 Oct; 115(4):928-31. PubMed ID: 170337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The xenogeneic effect. II. Requirement for unactivated murine T cells during restoration of immune responsiveness with xenogeneic reconstitution factor.
    Farrar JJ; Fuller-Bonar J
    J Immunol; 1976 Jul; 117(1):274-82. PubMed ID: 778265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Immunosuppression by spleen cells from Moloney leukemia. Comparison of the suppressive effect on antibody response and on mitogen-induced response.
    Cerny J; Stiller RA
    J Immunol; 1975 Oct; 115(4):943-9. PubMed ID: 170339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A re-evaluation of the role of macrophages in carrageenan-induced immunosuppression.
    Rumjanek VM; Watson SR; Sljivić VS
    Immunology; 1977 Sep; 33(3):423-32. PubMed ID: 332622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early postnatal exposure to cigarette smoke impairs the antigen-specific T-cell responses in the spleen.
    Singh SP; Razani-Boroujerdi S; Pena-Philippides JC; Langley RJ; Mishra NC; Sopori ML
    Toxicol Lett; 2006 Dec; 167(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 17113252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Regulation of immune response to SRBC: suppressor cell activity induced by soluble fraction of antigen.
    Lukić ML; Janezić A; Popesković L
    Immunology; 1978 May; 34(5):791-9. PubMed ID: 350759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. T cell-dependent mediator and B-cell clones.
    Lefkovits I; QUintáns J; Munro A; Waldmann H
    Immunology; 1975 Jun; 28(6):1149-54. PubMed ID: 1093973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhancement of the in vitro antibody response in dietary protein restriction. Failure in the regulation of antibody synthesis.
    Pocino M; Malavé I
    Immunology; 1981 Jun; 43(2):235-40. PubMed ID: 7019050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Analysis of certain mechanisms of antigen-specific suppression of the immune response].
    Pisarev VM; Stukalov SV
    Biull Eksp Biol Med; 1981 Aug; 92(8):61-3. PubMed ID: 6170364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Postnatal development of T cells. III. Thymus independency of T-cell-dependent antigen response in the neonatal spleen.
    Papiernik M; Ezine S
    Immunology; 1982 May; 46(1):209-14. PubMed ID: 7042549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The immunodepressive effect of Friend virus III. Effects on spleen T cells.
    Dracott BN; Wedderburn N; Doenhoff MJ
    Immunology; 1977 Oct; 33(4):573-80. PubMed ID: 336523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Cellular kinetics of the primary immune response after application of phytohemagglutinin].
    Hegedüs VM; Schramm-Thiel N; Wacker A
    Arzneimittelforschung; 1975 Feb; 25(2):222-3. PubMed ID: 1091271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maintenance of hyporesponsiveness to antigen by a distinct subclass of T lymphocytes.
    Weitzman S; Shen FW; Cantor H
    J Immunol; 1976 Dec; 117(6):2209-12. PubMed ID: 62809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Aggregated IgG-induced suppression of in vitro antibody responses: definition of the cellular target(s).
    Nicholson JK; McDougal JS
    J Immunol; 1981 Jun; 126(6):2382-9. PubMed ID: 6453164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.