These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7000819)

  • 1. Collaborative investigation of the AutoMicrobic System Enterobacteriaceae biochemical card.
    Isenberg HD; Gavan TL; Smith PB; Sonnenwirth A; Taylor W; Martin WJ; Rhoden D; Balows A
    J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Jun; 11(6):694-702. PubMed ID: 7000819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laboratory evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Freeman JW; Rowland RW; Overman SB; Goodman NL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 May; 13(5):895-8. PubMed ID: 7016913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the automicrobic system with API, enterotube, micro-ID, micro-media systems, and conventional methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Kelly MT; Latimer JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Nov; 12(5):659-62. PubMed ID: 7024296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical laboratory evaluation of the automicrobic system Enterobacteriaceae biochemical card.
    Davis JR; Stager CE; Wende RD; Qadri SM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Oct; 14(4):370-5. PubMed ID: 7026606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system for identification of glucose-nonfermenting gram-negative rods.
    Smith SM; Cundy KR; Gilardi GL; Wong W
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Feb; 15(2):302-7. PubMed ID: 7040451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical laboratory evaluation of the Auto-Microbic system for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Hasyn JJ; Cundy KR; Dietz CC; Wong W
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Mar; 13(3):491-7. PubMed ID: 7016898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of the automicrobic system (with the Enterobacteriaceae-plus biochemical card) for identifying clinical isolates of Gram- negative bacilli.
    Barry AL; Gavan TL; Badal RE; Telenson MJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Apr; 15(4):582-8. PubMed ID: 7040457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Crystal Enteric/Nonfermenter system, API 20E system, and Vitek AutoMicrobic system for identification of gram-negative bacilli.
    Robinson A; McCarter YS; Tetreault J
    J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Feb; 33(2):364-70. PubMed ID: 7714193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the Quantum II Bacterial Identification System and the AutoMicrobic System for the identification of gram-negative bacilli.
    Pfaller MA; Bale MJ; Schulte KR; Koontz FP
    J Clin Microbiol; 1986 Jan; 23(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 3517034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accurate automated identification of selected Enterobacteriaceae at four hours.
    Ferraro MJ; Edelblut MA; Kunz LJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Jan; 13(1):151-7. PubMed ID: 7007419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characterization and clinical identification of Enterobacteriaceae by DNA hybridization.
    Brenner DJ
    Prog Clin Pathol; 1978; 7():71-117. PubMed ID: 345354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identification of Enterobacteriaceae by the automicrobic system: Enterobacteriaceae biochemical cards versus Enterobacteriaceae-plus biochemical cards.
    Barry AL; Badal RE
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Apr; 15(4):575-81. PubMed ID: 7040456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of an automated, computerized system (automicrobic system) for Enterobacteriaceae identification.
    Burdash NM; Teti G; West ME; Bannister ER; Manos JP
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Feb; 13(2):331-4. PubMed ID: 7009640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the autoSCAN-W/A rapid bacterial identification system and the Vitek AutoMicrobic system for identification of gram-negative bacilli.
    Pfaller MA; Sahm D; O'Hara C; Ciaglia C; Yu M; Yamane N; Scharnweber G; Rhoden D
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Jul; 29(7):1422-8. PubMed ID: 1885737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rapid processing of urine specimens by urine screening and the AutoMicrobic system.
    Wadke M; McDonnell C; Ashton JK
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Oct; 16(4):668-72. PubMed ID: 6759524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the automicrobic system gram-positive identification card for species identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci.
    Almeida RJ; Jorgensen JH; Johnson JE
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Aug; 18(2):438-9. PubMed ID: 6352738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Biochemical characteristics of strains from the Citrobacter and Hafnia genera and their laboratory identification].
    Kalashnikova GK; Leĭmane ZIa; Latysheva EA; Lovlia AM; Tikhomirova RI
    Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol; 1976 Apr; (3):108-12. PubMed ID: 961244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the MS-2 system for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    McCracken AW; Martin WJ; McCarthy LR; Schwab DA; Cooper BH; Helgeson NG; Prowant S; Robson J
    J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Nov; 12(5):684-9. PubMed ID: 7024299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multipoint identification of Enterobacteriaceae: report of the British Society for Microbial Technology collaborative study.
    Winstanley TG; Limb DI; Wheat PF; Nicol CD
    J Clin Pathol; 1993 Jul; 46(7):637-41. PubMed ID: 8157751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rapid automated method for screening of enteric pathogens from stool specimens.
    Villasante PA; Agulla A; Merino FJ; Pérez T; Ladrón de Guevara C; Velasco AC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1987 Mar; 25(3):584-5. PubMed ID: 3553230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.