BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7001296)

  • 1. Comparison of success and morbidity in cervical cerclage procedures.
    Harger JH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Nov; 56(5):543-8. PubMed ID: 7001296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cervical cerclage. A review of 74 cases.
    Schwartz RP; Chatwani A; Sullivan P
    J Reprod Med; 1984 Feb; 29(2):103-6. PubMed ID: 6368815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Management of cervical cerclage at term: remove the suture in labor?
    Abdelhak YE; Aronov R; Roque H; Young BK
    J Perinat Med; 2000; 28(6):453-7. PubMed ID: 11155431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cervical incompetence: diagnostic and therapeutic aspects.
    Toaff R; Toaff ME; Ballas S; Ophir A
    Isr J Med Sci; 1977 Jan; 13(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 838569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Cervical cerclage with buried prosthetic band: technique, indications and results in a series of 28 pregnancies].
    Gervaise A; Senat MV; Audibert F; Frydman R; Fernandez H
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2000 Oct; 29(6):579-87. PubMed ID: 11084465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shirodkar versus McDonald cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth in women with short cervical length.
    Odibo AO; Berghella V; To MS; Rust OA; Althuisius SM; Nicolaides KH
    Am J Perinatol; 2007 Jan; 24(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 17195146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Elective and emergency transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage for cervical incompetence.
    Hole J; Tressler T; Martinez F
    J Reprod Med; 2003 Aug; 48(8):596-600. PubMed ID: 12971139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cervical cerclage: a ten-year review in a large hospital.
    Cardwell MS
    South Med J; 1988 Jan; 81(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 3336794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Labor outcomes after Shirodkar cerclage.
    Fox NS; Rebarber A; Bender S; Saltzman DH
    J Reprod Med; 2009 Jun; 54(6):361-5. PubMed ID: 19639925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ultrasound-indicated cerclage: Shirodkar vs. McDonald.
    Hume H; Rebarber A; Saltzman DH; Roman AS; Fox NS
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Dec; 25(12):2690-2. PubMed ID: 22873518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of a new technique of prophylactic cervical cerclage simplified from the Shirodkar cerclage: A pilot study.
    Bartolo S; Garabedian C; Deruelle P; Debarge V; Ducloy-Bouthors AS; Subtil D
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr; 46(4):343-347. PubMed ID: 28643662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cervical internal os cerclage: description of a new technique and comparison with Shirodkar operation.
    Caspi E; Schneider DF; Mor Z; Langer R; Weinraub Z; Bukovsky I
    Am J Perinatol; 1990 Oct; 7(4):347-9. PubMed ID: 2222626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Emergency cerclage compared with bed rest for advanced cervical dilatation in pregnancy.
    Olatunbosun OA; al-Nuaim L; Turnell RW
    Int Surg; 1995; 80(2):170-4. PubMed ID: 8530237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pregnancy outcomes in women treated with elective versus ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage.
    Guzman ER; Forster JK; Vintzileos AM; Ananth CV; Walters C; Gipson K
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Nov; 12(5):323-7. PubMed ID: 9819870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Emergency cervical cerclage: a retrospective review of 51 cases.
    Wong GP; Farquharson DF; Dansereau J
    Am J Perinatol; 1993 Sep; 10(5):341-7. PubMed ID: 8240589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prophylactic cerclage in pregnancy. Effect in women with a history of conization.
    Zeisler H; Joura EA; Bancher-Todesca D; Hanzal E; Gitsch G
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Jul; 42(7):390-2. PubMed ID: 9252928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Experiences with the Shirodkar-McDonald cerclage in the treatment of cervix insufficiency].
    Döring GK; Hachemi M; Hüttig G
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1986 Feb; 46(2):90-2. PubMed ID: 3514367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prognostic factors and complication rates for cervical cerclage: a review of 482 cases.
    Treadwell MC; Bronsteen RA; Bottoms SF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Sep; 165(3):555-8. PubMed ID: 1892180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Shirodkar operation: a reappraisal.
    Frieden FJ; Ordorica SA; Hoskins IA; Young BK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Sep; 163(3):830-3. PubMed ID: 2206071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surgical treatment of incompetent cervix during pregnancy by Saito modification of Shirodkar operation.
    Tei A
    Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ; 1987 Dec; 34(4):69-73. PubMed ID: 3481691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.