These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7002809)

  • 21. o'Connor v. Donaldson: the death of the quid pro quo argument for a right to treatment?
    Bliss TP
    Clevel State Law Rev; 1975; 24(3):557-71. PubMed ID: 11661275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. parham v. J.R. and Secretary of Public Welfare v. Institutionalized Juveniles: civil commitments and the balance of authority between child, parent, and state.
    Martin CA
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1980 Jan; 7(1):158-69. PubMed ID: 11660936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Children and the idea of liberty: a comment on the civil commitment cases.
    Garvey JH
    KY Law J; 1979-1980; 68(54):809-43. PubMed ID: 11649181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Donaldson v. O'Connor: constitutional right to treatment for the involuntary civilly committed.
    Jernigan LT
    North Carol Centr Law J; 1975; 7(1):174-86. PubMed ID: 11664561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A review of major implications of the O'Connor v. Donaldson decision.
    Kopolow LE
    Am J Psychiatry; 1976 Apr; 133(4):379-83. PubMed ID: 1267034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Considerations of social science in a reconsideration of Parham v. J.R. and the commitment of children to public mental institutions.
    Schmidt WC
    J Psychiatry Law; 1985; 13(3-4):339-59. PubMed ID: 11649764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mental health commitment: the state of the debate, 1980.
    Roth LG
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1980 Jun; 31(6):385-96. PubMed ID: 7380401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Post-Parham remedies: the involuntary commitment of minors in Virginia after Parham v. J.R.
    Spaulding WJ
    Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1979; 13(4):695-741. PubMed ID: 11665159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Postadmission due process for mentally ill and mentally retarded children after Parham v. J.R. and Secretary of Public Welfare v. Institutionalized Juveniles.
    Joseph BC
    Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1979; 29(1):129-57. PubMed ID: 11665106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Open Sesame: the Constitution and mental institutions.
    Trotter RJ
    Sci News; 1975 Jul; 108(2):30-1. PubMed ID: 11664469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Historic Supreme Court decision on the voluntary admission of minors issued.
    Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1979; 3(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 11665050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Constitutional law--due process--civil commitment of children by parents--Parham v. J.R.
    Citarella KC
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1980; 25(4):1001-25. PubMed ID: 11658638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Parham v. J. R.: "voluntary" commitment of minors to mental institutions.
    Tiano LV
    Am J Law Med; 1980; 6(1):125-49. PubMed ID: 7435506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A review of the Burger Court: Part I.
    Parry J
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1984; 8(6):502-8. PubMed ID: 11658589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Constitutional law--simple custodial confinement of civilly committed nondangerous mentally ill violates constitutional right to freedom.
    Concemi M
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1975; 10(1):76-99. PubMed ID: 11664545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Kenneth Donaldson's fight for freedom.
    Steinzor R
    Progressive; 1977 Apr; 41(4):48-50. PubMed ID: 11665041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. "May you stay forever young": Robert Sadoff and the history of mental disability law.
    Perlin ML
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(2):236-44. PubMed ID: 15985668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. "Who are you to say what my best interest is?" Minors' due process rights when admitted by parents for inpatient mental health treatment.
    Schmidt K
    Wash Law Rev; 1996 Oct; 71(4):1187-217. PubMed ID: 11660505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Formal commitment hearings not necessary for children, Supreme Court rulings say.
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1979 Sep; 30(9):645, 649. PubMed ID: 468145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Addington v. Texas--standard of proof in civil commitment proceedings--a logical middle ground.
    Ross JJ
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1979; 6(3):597-608. PubMed ID: 11665139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.