BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 700345)

  • 1. [Cervical smears in women under 30 years age (author's transl)].
    Dartsch W; Freundl G; Massenkeil HJ
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1978 Oct; 38(10):849-52. PubMed ID: 700345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Breast and cervical carcinoma screening practices among women in rural and nonrural areas of the United States, 1998-1999.
    Coughlin SS; Thompson TD; Hall HI; Logan P; Uhler RJ
    Cancer; 2002 Jun; 94(11):2801-12. PubMed ID: 12115366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Results of the Leiden mass screening for cervix uteri carcinoma; the 'young' (24-34 years) versus the 'old' (35-54 years) group of women].
    Boon ME; de Graaff Guilloud-Gentenaar JC; Beck S
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1990 Aug; 134(32):1545-9. PubMed ID: 2392176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Results of cytologic mass screening in the Federal Republic of Germany.
    Soost HJ; Bockmühl B; Zock H
    Acta Cytol; 1982; 26(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 6957096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Positive cytological smears in adolescents and young women].
    Steps H
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1982 Aug; 42(8):613-5. PubMed ID: 6922814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Results of the study of 96,483 cervical smears of young females up to 30 years of age. A review 5 years following the expansion of a preventive care program].
    Bierfreund B
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1986 Nov; 46(11):804-7. PubMed ID: 3803874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [A retrospective study of carcinoma of the uterine cervix and the value of cytological cervix studies in healthy women].
    Barentsz JO; Muizebelt F; van der Schee AC; Toonen-van Beek AA
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1979 Nov; 123(45):1932-6. PubMed ID: 514382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Results of a computer assisted screening program for gynecologic mass examinations (author's transl)].
    Seidenschnur G; Neumann HG; Büttner HH; Bader G; Beust M
    Arch Geschwulstforsch; 1977; 47(4):298-303. PubMed ID: 921483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experience in screening for cervical cancer in rural areas of Barsi Tehsil (Maharashtra).
    Nene BM; Jayant K; Malvi SG; Dale PS; Deshpande R
    Indian J Cancer; 1994 Mar; 31(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 8063335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Carcinoma in situ and cervical carcinoma during the use of oral contraceptives].
    Wunder G
    Fortschr Med; 1973 Sep; 91(27):1082-4. PubMed ID: 4746761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The frequency and importance of gynaecological screening in older women (author's transl)].
    Kubista E; Nezbeda J
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1980 Jul; 92(14):506-9. PubMed ID: 6933742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [To what extent have early cancer detection and preventive examination for cancer of the uterine cervix fulfilled established expectations?].
    Soost HJ; Lehmacher W; Ruffing-Kullmann B
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1989 Jun; 49(6):579-86. PubMed ID: 2787261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Arkansas cervical cancer program.
    Steinkamp RC; Roman-Lopez J; Kenney JA; Hairston MG; Hylton S; Hammett WN; Marsh S; Becton P; Collier S
    J Ark Med Soc; 1980 Jan; 76(1):312-22. PubMed ID: 6444400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experience of a continuing mass screening programme. Screening and re-screening for cervical carcinoma in Turku.
    Grönroos M; Tyrkkö J; Järvi O; Rauramo L
    Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn; 1974; 63(6):470-8. PubMed ID: 4441027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A cohort study of cervical cancer screening in British Columbia.
    Boyes DA; Morrison B; Knox EG; Draper GJ; Miller AB
    Clin Invest Med; 1982; 5(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 7116711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Results of cytologic examinations of the cervix in women under the age of thirty (author's transl)].
    Furch W; Cramer H
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1976 May; 36(5):381-7. PubMed ID: 1278659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A prospective study showing long-term infection with human papillomavirus 16 before the development of cervical carcinoma in situ.
    Ylitalo N; Josefsson A; Melbye M; Sörensen P; Frisch M; Andersen PK; Sparén P; Gustafsson M; Magnusson P; Pontén J; Gyllensten U; Adami HO
    Cancer Res; 2000 Nov; 60(21):6027-32. PubMed ID: 11085523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The costs of cancer screening (author's transl)].
    Neumann G
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1975 Aug; 35(8):615-8. PubMed ID: 1175903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Computer-assisted screening for cervical carcinoma--the results for a 10-year period].
    Neumann HG; Seidenschnur G
    Arch Geschwulstforsch; 1987; 57(2):129-39. PubMed ID: 3296989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Increase of in-situ cervix uteri carcinoma in women under 35; data analysis from family practice 1974-1986].
    Boon ME; Rietveld WJ; de Graaff Guilloud JC
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1988 Jul; 132(27):1240-3. PubMed ID: 2840584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.