These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7004557)
1. A controlled trial to evaluate and compare a sutureless skin closure technique (Op-Site skin closure) with conventional skin suturing and clipping in abdominal surgery. Eaton AC Br J Surg; 1980 Dec; 67(12):857-60. PubMed ID: 7004557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Problems with the use of Op-Site sutureless skin closures in orthopaedic procedures. Bunker TD Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1983 Jul; 65(4):260-2. PubMed ID: 6347014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of upper abdominal wound closure with monofilament nylon and polyglycolic acid. Askew AR Aust N Z J Surg; 1983 Aug; 53(4):353-6. PubMed ID: 6311152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative study of leg wound skin closure in coronary artery bypass graft operations. Angelini GD; Butchart EG; Armistead SH; Breckenridge IM Thorax; 1984 Dec; 39(12):942-5. PubMed ID: 6096982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative study of median sternotomy and standard thoracotomy wound skin closure methods. Angelini GD; Passani SP; Kulatilake EN Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Feb; 33(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 2579462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Op-Site skin closure: a comparison with subcuticular and interrupted sutures. Watson GM; Anders CJ; Glover JR Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1983 Mar; 65(2):83-4. PubMed ID: 6830136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two methods of skin closure in abdominal operations: a controlled clinical trial. Pickford IR; Brennan SS; Evans M; Pollock AV Br J Surg; 1983 Apr; 70(4):226-8. PubMed ID: 6338996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of skin glue versus traditional wound closure methods in brain surgery: A prospective, randomized, controlled study. Chibbaro S; Tacconi L J Clin Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 16(4):535-9. PubMed ID: 19231198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Stapler suture or single button suture? A controlled clinical study on the comparison of both skin closure methods]. Priesack W; Troidl H; Kusche J Chirurg; 1985 Mar; 56(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 3886325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Abdominal wound closure comparing the proximate stapler with sutures. Lubowski D; Hunt D Aust N Z J Surg; 1985 Aug; 55(4):405-6. PubMed ID: 3915865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Metal staples versus conventional suture for wound closure in total knee arthroplasty]. Hlubek R; Walder P; Káňa J; Salounová D Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2014; 81(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 24945393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The suturing of abdominal incisions. A comparison of monofilament nylon and catgut. Tagart RE Br J Surg; 1967 Nov; 54(11):952-7. PubMed ID: 4861743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Sutureless skin closure for pacemaker implantation: comparison with subcuticular suture. Pitcher D Postgrad Med J; 1983 Feb; 59(688):83-5. PubMed ID: 6302649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of a new product for sutureless skin closure. Westaby S Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1980 Mar; 62(2):129-32. PubMed ID: 7377686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mass closure versus layer closure of abdominal wound: a prospective clinical study. Chowdhury SK; Choudhury SD J Indian Med Assoc; 1994 Jul; 92(7):229-32. PubMed ID: 7963604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomized controlled trial comparing subcuticular absorbable suture with conventional interrupted suture for wound closure at elective operation of colon cancer. Tanaka A; Sadahiro S; Suzuki T; Okada K; Saito G Surgery; 2014 Mar; 155(3):486-92. PubMed ID: 24439741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Abdominal wound closure: a trial of nylon, polyglycolic acid and steel sutures. Leaper DJ; Pollock AV; Evans M Br J Surg; 1977 Aug; 64(8):603-6. PubMed ID: 329939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]