These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7004557)

  • 21. Skin closure using nylon and polydioxanone: a comparison of results.
    Edwards DJ; Elson RA
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1995 Oct; 40(5):342-3. PubMed ID: 8523317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Subcuticular Prolene or PDS for skin closure?
    Vipond MN; Higgins AF
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1991 Apr; 36(2):97-9. PubMed ID: 2051429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Superficial incisional surgical site infection rate after cesarean section in obese women: a randomized controlled trial of subcuticular versus interrupted skin suturing.
    Ibrahim MI; Moustafa GF; Al-Hamid AS; Hussein MR
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 May; 289(5):981-6. PubMed ID: 24272023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Wound Complication Rates After Staples or Suture for Midline Vertical Skin Closure in Obese Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Kuroki LM; Mullen MM; Massad LS; Wu N; Liu J; Mutch DG; Powell MA; Hagemann AR; Thaker PH; McCourt CK; Novetsky AP
    Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 130(1):91-99. PubMed ID: 28594761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Late cosmetic results of wound closure, strips versus suture.
    Pedersen VM; Struckmann JR; Kjaergård HK; Geerdsen JP; Hansen PE
    Neth J Surg; 1987 Oct; 39(5):149-50. PubMed ID: 3317128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Controlled clinical trial of three suture materials for abdominal wall closure after bowl operations.
    Corman ML; Veidenheimer MC; Coller JA
    Am J Surg; 1981 Apr; 141(4):510-13. PubMed ID: 6452825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Skin closure. A prospective randomized study].
    Lundblad R; Simensen HV; Wiig JN; Niels Grüner OP
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1989 Apr; 109(12):1307-9. PubMed ID: 2660322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Abdominal wound closure--a comparison of monofilament nylon and polyglycolic acid.
    Bucknall TE; Ellis H
    Surgery; 1981 Jun; 89(6):672-7. PubMed ID: 6264641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Extrafascial wound dehiscence: deep en bloc closure versus superficial skin closure.
    Dodson MK; Magann EF; Sullivan DL; Meeks GR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jan; 83(1):142-5. PubMed ID: 8272296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinical comparison of Michel and Proximate clips used for abdominal wound closure.
    Gallagher P; Freeman JB
    Can J Surg; 1984 Nov; 27(6):594-7. PubMed ID: 6498655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A combination of subcuticular suture and sterile Micropore tape compared with conventional interrupted sutures for skin closure. A controlled trial.
    Taube M; Porter RJ; Lord PH
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1983 May; 65(3):164-7. PubMed ID: 6344732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A new sutureless technique for skin closure.
    Hasson HM; Nicoloff D; Ford CR; Lazarus H; O'Donoghue JB; Powell JR
    Arch Surg; 1976 Jan; 111(1):83-4. PubMed ID: 1106358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Randomised trial of subcuticular suture versus metal clips for wound closure after thyroid and parathyroid surgery.
    Selvadurai D; Wildin C; Treharne G; Choksy SA; Heywood MM; Nicholson ML
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1997 Jul; 79(4):303-6. PubMed ID: 9244079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Burst abdomen. A preventable complication, monolayer closure of the abdominal incision with monofilament nylon.
    Mathur SK
    J Postgrad Med; 1983 Oct; 29(4):223-9. PubMed ID: 6368809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Current standards of abdominal wall closure techniques : Conventional suture techniques].
    Heger P; Pianka F; Diener MK; Mihaljevic AL
    Chirurg; 2016 Sep; 87(9):737-743. PubMed ID: 27392763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Abdominal wound closure. A randomized prospective study of 571 patients comparing continuous vs. interrupted suture techniques.
    Richards PC; Balch CM; Aldrete JS
    Ann Surg; 1983 Feb; 197(2):238-43. PubMed ID: 6297417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Pfannenstiel incision closure: a review of current skin closure techniques.
    Altman AD; Allen VM; McNeil SA; Dempster J
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2009 Jun; 31(6):514-520. PubMed ID: 19646316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Antibacterial [corrected] coating of abdominal closure sutures and wound infection.
    Justinger C; Moussavian MR; Schlueter C; Kopp B; Kollmar O; Schilling MK
    Surgery; 2009 Mar; 145(3):330-4. PubMed ID: 19231586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparing cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive and conventional subcuticular skin sutures for maxillofacial incisions--a prospective randomized trial considering closure time, wound morbidity, and cosmetic outcome.
    Soni A; Narula R; Kumar A; Parmar M; Sahore M; Chandel M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 71(12):2152.e1-8. PubMed ID: 24237777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Aesthetic comparison of wound closure techniques in a porcine model.
    Tritle NM; Haller JR; Gray SD
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Nov; 111(11 Pt 1):1949-51. PubMed ID: 11801975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.