These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Quality assessment and medical care evaluation. Organ PJ J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 1988 Jun; 78(6):320-7. PubMed ID: 3135385 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Fourth PRO Scope of Work: automating the medical review process through the Uniform Clinical Data Set. Baker NA Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(3):11-9. PubMed ID: 10119374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A nursing role in medical peer review. Borowski R; Jacobsen DP; Nikolai TF; Lohrenz FN Hosp Prog; 1975 Dec; 56(12):65-6. PubMed ID: 1104467 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Medical Review of North Carolina--update on Medicare review. Godehn DJ N C Med J; 1987 Feb; 48(2):61-2. PubMed ID: 3550481 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Peer review and cost containment make a strange combination. Vignola M Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1982; 15(6):34-6. PubMed ID: 10309751 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. PMS testimony on Medicare and Medicaid. Marshall M Pa Med; 1970 Sep; 73(9):41-2. PubMed ID: 5004348 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. June 28 set as deadline for submitting criteria for peer review of HMO quality. Wallace C Mod Healthc; 1985 Jun; 15(13):68. PubMed ID: 10300142 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Whither the PRO? Analysis of the effectiveness of three Medicare peer review organizations in a Florida hospital. Fleegler BM; Wolk M; McCarville J J Fla Med Assoc; 1995 Mar; 82(3):203-5. PubMed ID: 7738525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. West Virginia Medical Institute: the Quality Improvement Organization for West Virginia. Brehm JG; Smith SM W V Med J; 2004; 100(5):178-80. PubMed ID: 15617461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Recovery Audit Contractors are rolling out: are you prepared? Hosp Peer Rev; 2009 Sep; 34(9):101-4. PubMed ID: 19746848 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. PRO manual changes details of review. Cofer J J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1985 May; 56(5):24-7. PubMed ID: 10273648 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Utilization and peer review by pharmacists. Laventurier M J Am Pharm Assoc; 1972 Apr; 12(4):166-70. PubMed ID: 5060998 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Did doctors really win this fight with Medicare? Clark L Med Econ; 1992 Mar; 69(5):65-6, 68-9, 72. PubMed ID: 10116530 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]