These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Concerning the health effects of internally deposited radionuclides. Raabe OG Health Phys; 2010 Mar; 98(3):515-36. PubMed ID: 20147792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radar commentary: Use of linear no-threshold hypothesis in radiation protection regulation in the United States. Siegel JA; Stabin MG Health Phys; 2012 Jan; 102(1):90-9. PubMed ID: 22134084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Carcinogenesis from inhaled (239)PuO(2) in beagles: Evidence for radiation homeostasis at low doses? Fisher DR; Weller RE Health Phys; 2010 Sep; 99(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 20699697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative comparisons of cancer induction in humans by internally deposited radionuclides and external radiation. Harrison JD; Muirhead CR Int J Radiat Biol; 2003 Jan; 79(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 12556326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know. Brenner DJ; Doll R; Goodhead DT; Hall EJ; Land CE; Little JB; Lubin JH; Preston DL; Preston RJ; Puskin JS; Ron E; Sachs RK; Samet JM; Setlow RB; Zaider M Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2003 Nov; 100(24):13761-6. PubMed ID: 14610281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Health risks of low photon energy imaging. Redpath JL Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 122(1-4):528-33. PubMed ID: 17261539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Henry S. Kaplan Distinguished Scientist Award 2003. The crooked shall be made straight; dose-response relationships for carcinogenesis. Hall EJ Int J Radiat Biol; 2004 May; 80(5):327-37. PubMed ID: 15223765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Update on linear non-threshold dose-response model and implications for diagnostic radiology procedures. Preston RJ Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):541-6. PubMed ID: 18849687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Low-dose radiation risk extrapolation fallacy associated with the linear-no-threshold model. Scott BR Hum Exp Toxicol; 2008 Feb; 27(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 18480143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ionizing radiation and cancer risk: evidence from epidemiology. Ron E Radiat Res; 1998 Nov; 150(5 Suppl):S30-41. PubMed ID: 9806607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genomic instability, bystander effect, cytoplasmic irradiation and other phenomena that may achieve fame without fortune. Hall EJ Phys Med; 2001; 17 Suppl 1():21-5. PubMed ID: 11770531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiation in the workplace-a review of studies of the risks of occupational exposure to ionising radiation. Wakeford R J Radiol Prot; 2009 Jun; 29(2A):A61-79. PubMed ID: 19454806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Extrapolating radiation-induced cancer risks from low doses to very low doses. Brenner DJ Health Phys; 2009 Nov; 97(5):505-9. PubMed ID: 19820460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiation protection: the NCRP guidelines and some considerations for the future. Sinclair WK Yale J Biol Med; 1981; 54(6):471-84. PubMed ID: 7342492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Basis of radiation protection]. Roth J; Schweizer P; Gückel C Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1996 Jun; 126(26):1157-71. PubMed ID: 8711464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cancer and non-cancer effects in Japanese atomic bomb survivors. Little MP J Radiol Prot; 2009 Jun; 29(2A):A43-59. PubMed ID: 19454804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. LNT--an apparent rather than a real controversy? Charles MW J Radiol Prot; 2006 Sep; 26(3):325-9. PubMed ID: 16926475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]