These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7006379)

  • 1. Four-hour presumptive identification of Enterobacteriaceae from blood cultures.
    Smith EG; Pritchard JK; McCarthy LR
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1981 Jan; 75(1):88-91. PubMed ID: 7006379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Micro-ID, a modified Minitek system, and conventional methods for four-hour identification of Enterobacteriacae directly from blood cultures.
    Wellstood S
    Am J Med Technol; 1982 Sep; 48(9):769-73. PubMed ID: 6753582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rapid automated identification of gram-negative bacilli from blood cultures with the AutoMicrobic system.
    Schifman RB; Ryan KJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Feb; 15(2):260-4. PubMed ID: 7040448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rapid identification of gram-negative bacilli from blood cultures.
    Stevens M; Parish GT
    J Med Microbiol; 1986 May; 21(3):215-8. PubMed ID: 3517338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Direct identification and susceptibility testing of enteric bacilli from positive blood cultures using VITEK (GNI+/GNS-GA).
    Hansen DS; Jensen AG; Nørskov-Lauritsen N; Skov R; Bruun B
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2002 Jan; 8(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 11906499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the Minitek system with conventional methods for identification of nonfermentative and oxidase-positive fermentative gram-negative bacilli.
    Wellstood-Nuesse S
    J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Apr; 9(4):511-6. PubMed ID: 379041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the Phoenix 100 ID/AST system and NID panel for identification of Enterobacteriaceae, Vibrionaceae, and commonly isolated nonenteric gram-negative bacilli.
    O'Hara CM
    J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Mar; 44(3):928-33. PubMed ID: 16517878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the Minitek test system with a conventional screening procedure for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Hanson CW; Marso E; Martin WJ
    Health Lab Sci; 1978 Jan; 15(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 346535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modified inoculum for the enteric Minitek system from positive blood cultures.
    Cleary TJ; Valdes S; Selem M
    J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Aug; 10(2):248-50. PubMed ID: 389952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Evaluation of two miniaturized systems widely used in the laboratories for the identification of the "Enterobacteriaceae" (author's transl)].
    Santini GF; Crovatto M; Chiaradia V; Marchi MP
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1979 Mar; 15(1):78-102. PubMed ID: 396548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the Minitek system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Kiehn TE; Brennan K; Ellner PD
    Appl Microbiol; 1974 Oct; 28(4):668-71. PubMed ID: 4609287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rapid detection of bacteremia caused by Enterobacteriaceae with subculture in broth and laser nephelometry.
    Bayardelle P; Brazeau M
    Can J Microbiol; 1982 Mar; 28(3):341-3. PubMed ID: 7044505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the MicroScan rapid neg ID3 panel for identification of Enterobacteriaceae and some common gram-negative nonfermenters.
    O'Hara CM; Miller JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 2000 Oct; 38(10):3577-80. PubMed ID: 11015366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of automated and rapid manual methods for the same-day identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Jorgensen JH; Johnson JE; Alexander GA; Paxson R; Alderson GL
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1983 Jun; 79(6):683-7. PubMed ID: 6342361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rapid detection and identification of enteric bacteria from blood cultures.
    Kocka FE; Morello JA
    J Infect Dis; 1975 Apr; 131(4):456-8. PubMed ID: 804025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the Minitek system for direct identification of anaerobic rods from positive blood cultures.
    Polomski JC; McClatchey KD
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Oct; 16(4):673-5. PubMed ID: 6759525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of four commercial systems for the identification of nonfermentative gram-negative bacilli.
    Burdash NM; Bannister ER; Manos JP; West ME
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1980 Apr; 73(4):564-9. PubMed ID: 6989231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of a commercial identification kit and conventional biochemical tests used for the identification of enteric gram-negative rods.
    McCarthy LR; Mayo JB; Bell G; Armstrong D
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1978 Feb; 69(2):161-4. PubMed ID: 343571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparison of API-10s and Minitek with conventional biochemical tests (author's transl)].
    Stanek G; Hirschl A; Rotter M
    Zentralbl Bakteriol A; 1980 Feb; 246(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 6999781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of RapID-ANA and Minitek with a conventional method for biochemical identification of anaerobes.
    Hussain Z; Lannigan R; Schieven BC; Stoakes L; Kelly T; Groves D
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1987 May; 7(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 3319374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.