These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7006427)

  • 21. Closed suction or penrose drainage after partial nephrectomy: does it matter?
    Sánchez-Ortiz R; Madsen LT; Swanson DA; Canfield SE; Wood CG
    J Urol; 2004 Jan; 171(1):244-6. PubMed ID: 14665885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A randomized study of closed wound suction drainage for extensive lumbar spine surgery.
    Brown MD; Brookfield KF
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 May; 29(10):1066-8. PubMed ID: 15131430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Efficacy of closed wound suction drainage after single-level lumbar laminectomy.
    Payne DH; Fischgrund JS; Herkowitz HN; Barry RL; Kurz LT; Montgomery DM
    J Spinal Disord; 1996 Oct; 9(5):401-3. PubMed ID: 8938608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Drainage or suture of the cavity after breast biopsy.
    Law NW; Johnson CD; Lamont PM; Ellis H
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1990 Jan; 72(1):11-3. PubMed ID: 2405764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The evaluation of safety drain after cholecystectomy.
    Dubecz S; Juhász F; Bottlik G; Várnai P
    Acta Chir Hung; 1990; 31(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 2132910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Closed suction surgical wound drainage after orthopaedic surgery.
    Parker MJ; Roberts C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (4):CD001825. PubMed ID: 11687125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Application of closed negative pressure irrigation and suction device in the treatment of high perianal abscess].
    Chen SQ; Liu WC; Zhang ZZ; Lin LY; Chen SM; Huang GL; Lin CZ; Wang L
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Apr; 22(4):364-369. PubMed ID: 31054551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Closed suction drainage versus closed simple drainage in the management of modified radical mastectomy wounds.
    Ezeome ER; Adebamowo CA
    S Afr Med J; 2008 Sep; 98(9):712-5. PubMed ID: 19113053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cholecystectomy: safe or not safe to drain?
    Mellor SG; Thomas MH; Donnellan BS
    J R Soc Med; 1988 Oct; 81(10):566-8. PubMed ID: 3184087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinical trial of drainage following cholecystectomy: suction versus static drainage.
    Jha IN; Singh HB; Prasad N
    J Indian Med Assoc; 1986 Nov; 84(11):341-2. PubMed ID: 3295055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A controlled trial of drainage after cholecystectomy.
    Gordon AB; Bates T; Fiddian RV
    Br J Surg; 1976 Apr; 63(4):278-82. PubMed ID: 776322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prospective randomized clinical trial of the value of intraperitoneal drainage after pancreatic resection.
    Conlon KC; Labow D; Leung D; Smith A; Jarnagin W; Coit DG; Merchant N; Brennan MF
    Ann Surg; 2001 Oct; 234(4):487-93; discussion 493-4. PubMed ID: 11573042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Results of a randomized controlled trial comparing closed-suction drains versus passive gravity drains after pancreatic resection.
    Čečka F; Jon B; Skalický P; Čermáková E; Neoral Č; Loveček M
    Surgery; 2018 Nov; 164(5):1057-1063. PubMed ID: 30082139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Closed suction drainage improves clinical outcome in patients undergoing endoscopic vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Krishnamoorthy B; Al-Fagih OS; Madi MI; Najam O; Waterworth PD; Fildes JE; Yonan N
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2012 Apr; 93(4):1201-5. PubMed ID: 22397987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The current status of peritoneal drainage.
    Wosornu L
    Trop Gastroenterol; 1991; 12(2):54-8. PubMed ID: 1949205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Incision and drainage versus incision and drainage with primary closure and use of closed suction drain in acute abscesses.
    Dubey V; Choudhary SK
    Wounds; 2013 Mar; 25(3):58-60. PubMed ID: 25867936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Continuous high-pressure negative suction drain: new powerful tool for closed wound management: clinical experience.
    Shin SJ; Han D; Song H; Jang YJ; Park DH; Park MC
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 25(4):1427-31. PubMed ID: 24905942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Abdominal drainage following appendectomy and cholecystectomy.
    Stone HH; Hooper CA; Millikan WJ
    Ann Surg; 1978 Jun; 187(6):606-12. PubMed ID: 646499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The value of suction wound drain after carotid and femoral artery surgery: a randomised trial using duplex assessment of the volume of post-operative haematoma.
    Youssef F; Jenkins MP; Dawson KJ; Berger L; Myint F; Hamilton G
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2005 Feb; 29(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 15649723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of two types of vacuum drainage after cholecystectomy.
    Salam IM; McMullin JP; O'Higgins NJ
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1984 May; 66(3):190-1. PubMed ID: 6721407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.