These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 700653)
1. After Bakke many questions are left unanswered. Graumann FW; Lippman ME Hospitals; 1978 Nov; 52(22):73-5. PubMed ID: 700653 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The University of California v. Bakke: the court's three decisions. Sindler AP Regulation; 1978; 2(5):15-23. PubMed ID: 10238565 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The University of California v. Bakke: a murky future. Bork RH Regulation; 1978; 2(5):36-9. PubMed ID: 10238569 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The University of California v. Bakke: conversation with a dean of admissions. Marshall B Regulation; 1978; 2(5):39. PubMed ID: 10238570 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The ethical questions involved in the upcoming Bakke case decision. Bristow LR Forum Med; 1978 May; 1(2):24-5. PubMed ID: 10236756 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A legal perspective on the Bakke decision. Tallent SE Pers J; 1979 May; 58(5):296-302, 325. PubMed ID: 10241468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Backing into Bakke. Health PAC Bull; 1977 Jun; (76):4-5. PubMed ID: 10236351 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Affirmative action and the Bakke case. Scala B Adm Manage; 1977 Dec; 38(12):26-7, 65. PubMed ID: 10236089 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The University of California v. Bakke: reparations are justified for blacks. Jackson J Regulation; 1978; 2(5):24-9. PubMed ID: 10238566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Medical school admissions: the case for a quota. Geiger HJ; Sidel VW Hastings Cent Rep; 1978 Oct; 8(5):18-20. PubMed ID: 721434 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Bakke v. The University of California. Bonham GW Change; 1977 Oct; 9(10):18, 20-1. PubMed ID: 10236159 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. More on Bakke. Sweigert WT Pers Adm; 1978 Oct; 23(10):6-8. PubMed ID: 10238890 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The 'bottom line' after Connecticut v. Teal. Blumrosen AW Employee Relat Law J; 1983; 8(4):572-86. PubMed ID: 10259398 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Court acceptance of Uniform Guidelines provisions: the bottom line and the search for alternatives. Thompson DE; Christiansen PS Employee Relat Law J; 1983; 8(4):587-602. PubMed ID: 10259399 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. In search of a just outcome. Fitt AB Change; 1977 Oct; 9(10):22-5, 59. PubMed ID: 10236161 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A review of legal challenges to personnel testing. Hinkel AL J Ment Health Adm; 1981; 8(2):49-51. PubMed ID: 10252025 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Nondiscrimination in federally assisted programs; Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; policy interpretation--Office for Civil Rights, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Fed Regist; 1979 Oct; 44(197):58509-11. PubMed ID: 10244079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Alternative selection procedures and the Uniform Guidelines: improving the quality of employer investigations. Florkowski GW Employee Relat Law J; 1983; 8(4):603-17. PubMed ID: 10259400 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Bakke v. The University of California. Viewpoint 1: the case for preference. Daniels L; Farmer FE Change; 1977 Oct; 9(10):19, 58-9. PubMed ID: 10236160 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]