170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7009641)
1. Clinical evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system Yeast Biochemical Card for rapid identification of medically important yeasts.
Oblack DL; Rhodes JC; Martin WJ
J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Feb; 13(2):351-5. PubMed ID: 7009641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Update and evaluation of the AutoMicrobic yeast identification system.
Land G; Stotler R; Land K; Staneck J
J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Oct; 20(4):649-52. PubMed ID: 6386872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of three commercial systems for identification of yeasts commonly isolated in the clinical microbiology laboratory.
Wadlin JK; Hanko G; Stewart R; Pape J; Nachamkin I
J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Jun; 37(6):1967-70. PubMed ID: 10325356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Collaborative evaluation of the Abbott yeast identification system.
Cooper BH; Prowant S; Alexander B; Brunson DH
J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Jun; 19(6):853-6. PubMed ID: 6381526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of four commercial biochemical test systems for identification of yeasts.
Bergan T; Hollum AB; Vangdal M
Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Aug; 1(4):217-22. PubMed ID: 6756911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the new API 20C strip for yeast identification against a conventional method.
Land GA; Harrison BA; Hulme KL; Cooper BH; Byrd JC
J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Sep; 10(3):357-64. PubMed ID: 385621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Limitations of the current microbial identification system for identification of clinical yeast isolates.
Kellogg JA; Bankert DA; Chaturvedi V
J Clin Microbiol; 1998 May; 36(5):1197-200. PubMed ID: 9574676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rapid identification of yeasts by semi-automated and conventional methods.
Qadri SM; Flournoy DJ; Qadri SG; Ramirez EG
Med Microbiol Immunol; 1986; 175(5):307-16. PubMed ID: 3762492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Evaluation of common commercial systems for the identification of yeast isolates in microbiology laboratories: a multicenter study].
Karabıçak N; Uludağ Altun H; Karatuna O; Hazırolan G; Aksu N; Adiloğlu A; Akyar I
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2015 Apr; 49(2):210-20. PubMed ID: 26167821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card and API 20C yeast identification systems.
Fenn JP; Segal H; Barland B; Denton D; Whisenant J; Chun H; Christofferson K; Hamilton L; Carroll K
J Clin Microbiol; 1994 May; 32(5):1184-7. PubMed ID: 8051243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of Abbott Quantum II yeast identification system.
Salkin IF; Schadow KH; Bankaitis LA; McGinnis MR; Kemna ME
J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Sep; 22(3):442-4. PubMed ID: 3900130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative evaluation of the Iatron serological Candida check kit and the API 20C kit for identification of medically important Candida species.
Shinoda T; Kaufman L; Padhye AA
J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Mar; 13(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 7016900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis for identification of yeast species isolated from bovine intramammary infection.
Fadda ME; Pisano MB; Scaccabarozzi L; Mossa V; Deplano M; Moroni P; Liciardi M; Cosentino S
J Dairy Sci; 2013; 96(12):7692-7. PubMed ID: 24119798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of a modified dye pour-plate auxanographic method for the rapid identification of clinically significant yeasts. Comparison with two commercial systems.
Weymann LH; Stager CE; Qadri SG; Villarreal A; Qadri SM
Med Microbiol Immunol; 1979 Mar; 167(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 375051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Misidentification of clinical yeast isolates by using the updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card.
Dooley DP; Beckius ML; Jeffrey BS
J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Dec; 32(12):2889-92. PubMed ID: 7883873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the Quantum II, API Yeast Ident, and AutoMicrobic systems for identification of clinical yeast isolates.
Pfaller MA; Preston T; Bale M; Koontz FP; Body BA
J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Oct; 26(10):2054-8. PubMed ID: 3182994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the new Mycotube test-kit for yeast identification.
Guinet RM
Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Feb; 4(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 3886377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the Baxter-MicroScan 4-hour enzyme-based yeast identification system.
Land GA; Salkin IF; el-Zaatari M; McGinnis MR; Hashem G
J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Apr; 29(4):718-22. PubMed ID: 1653786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laboratory evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
Freeman JW; Rowland RW; Overman SB; Goodman NL
J Clin Microbiol; 1981 May; 13(5):895-8. PubMed ID: 7016913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the Biolog MicroStation system for yeast identification.
McGinnis MR; Molina TC; Pierson DL; Mishra SK
J Med Vet Mycol; 1996; 34(5):349-52. PubMed ID: 8912169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
