These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7009641)

  • 21. Clinical comparison of the Baxter MicroScan Yeast Identification Panel and the Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card.
    Riddle DL; Giger O; Miller L; Hall GS; Woods GL
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Apr; 101(4):438-42. PubMed ID: 8160633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Simple strategy for direct identification of medically important yeast species from positive blood culture vials.
    Sheppard DC; René P; Harris AD; Miller MA; Laverdière M; deSouza E; Robson HG
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Jun; 37(6):2040-1. PubMed ID: 10325374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of an automated, computerized system (automicrobic system) for Enterobacteriaceae identification.
    Burdash NM; Teti G; West ME; Bannister ER; Manos JP
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Feb; 13(2):331-4. PubMed ID: 7009640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A simple disk-diffusion test for differentiation of yeast species.
    Sobczak H
    J Med Microbiol; 1985 Dec; 20(3):307-16. PubMed ID: 3906135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system for identification of yeasts.
    Hasyn JJ; Buckley HR
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Nov; 16(5):901-4. PubMed ID: 6759531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Multicenter evaluation of the new VITEK 2 advanced colorimetric yeast identification card.
    Hata DJ; Hall L; Fothergill AW; Larone DH; Wengenack NL
    J Clin Microbiol; 2007 Apr; 45(4):1087-92. PubMed ID: 17267631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Identification of clinical yeast isolates by using the Microring YT.
    McGowan KL; Mortensen JE
    J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Feb; 31(2):185-7. PubMed ID: 8432801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of the rapid yeast plus panel with the API20C yeast system for identification of clinically significant isolates of Candida species.
    Heelan JS; Sotomayor E; Coon K; D'Arezzo JB
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 May; 36(5):1443-5. PubMed ID: 9574727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparative study of seven commercial yeast identification systems.
    Verweij PE; Breuker IM; Rijs AJ; Meis JF
    J Clin Pathol; 1999 Apr; 52(4):271-3. PubMed ID: 10474518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of the AUXACOLOR system, a new method of clinical yeast identification.
    Davey KG; Chant PM; Downer CS; Campbell CK; Warnock DW
    J Clin Pathol; 1995 Sep; 48(9):807-9. PubMed ID: 7490311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Variation in Microbial Identification System accuracy for yeast identification depending on commercial source of Sabouraud dextrose agar.
    Kellogg JA; Bankert DA; Chaturvedi V
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Jun; 37(6):2080-3. PubMed ID: 10325387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accurate automated identification of selected Enterobacteriaceae at four hours.
    Ferraro MJ; Edelblut MA; Kunz LJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Jan; 13(1):151-7. PubMed ID: 7007419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of the ATB 32C, automicrobic system and API 20C using clinical yeast isolates.
    Gutierrez J; Martin E; Lozano C; Coronilla J; Nogales C
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1994; 52(6):443-6. PubMed ID: 7856946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of the Quantum II yeast identification system.
    Kiehn TE; Edwards FF; Tom D; Lieberman G; Bernard EM; Armstrong D
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Aug; 22(2):216-9. PubMed ID: 3897264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of the updated Vitek yeast identification data base.
    el-Zaatari M; Pasarell L; McGinnis MR; Buckner J; Land GA; Salkin IF
    J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Sep; 28(9):1938-41. PubMed ID: 2229376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of the modified API 20C system for identification of clinically important yeasts.
    Buesching WJ; Kurek K; Roberts GD
    J Clin Microbiol; 1979 May; 9(5):565-69. PubMed ID: 383742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of the autoSCAN-W/A rapid bacterial identification system and the Vitek AutoMicrobic system for identification of gram-negative bacilli.
    Pfaller MA; Sahm D; O'Hara C; Ciaglia C; Yu M; Yamane N; Scharnweber G; Rhoden D
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Jul; 29(7):1422-8. PubMed ID: 1885737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of the VITEK 2 system for rapid identification of yeasts and yeast-like organisms.
    Graf B; Adam T; Zill E; Göbel UB
    J Clin Microbiol; 2000 May; 38(5):1782-5. PubMed ID: 10790099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of the AUXACOLOR system for the identification of clinical yeast isolates.
    Milan EP; Malheiros ES; Fischman O; Colombo AL
    Mycopathologia; 1997; 137(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 9368409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of methods for yeast identification including CHROMagar Candida, Vitek system YBC and a traditional biochemical method.
    Huang LU; Chen CH; Chou CF; Lu JJ; Chi WM; Lee WH
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 2001 Oct; 64(10):568-74. PubMed ID: 11791943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.