These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7011655)

  • 21. Moving standard deviation and moving sum of outliers as quality tools for monitoring analytical precision.
    Liu J; Tan CH; Badrick T; Loh TP
    Clin Biochem; 2018 Feb; 52():112-116. PubMed ID: 29107011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Quality control of drug assays.
    Richens A
    Ciba Found Symp; 1979; (74):69-79. PubMed ID: 261689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Use of alternative rules (other than the 1(2)s) for evaluating interlaboratory performance data.
    Ehrmeyer SS; Laessig RH; Schell K
    Clin Chem; 1988 Feb; 34(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 3342504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Analytical errors in clinical laboratories as assessed by an interlaboratory survey.
    Lever M; Munster DJ; Walmsley TA; Stewart AW
    Ann Clin Biochem; 1981 Jan; 18(Pt 1):28-36. PubMed ID: 7259062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Domestic and international trends concerning allowable limits of error in external quality assessment scheme].
    Hosogaya S; Ozaki Y
    Rinsho Byori; 2005 Jun; 53(6):547-53. PubMed ID: 16026083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Expressing analytical performance from multi-sample evaluation in laboratory EQA.
    Thelen MHM; Jansen RTP; Weykamp CW; Steigstra H; Meijer R; Cobbaert CM
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2017 Aug; 55(10):1509-1516. PubMed ID: 28182577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ability of the 1(2)s rule to detect substandard performance in interlaboratory proficiency testing.
    Ehrmeyer SS; Laessig RH
    Clin Chem; 1987 Jun; 33(6):788-91. PubMed ID: 3594815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Interlaboratory study into the proficiency of serum cholinesterase activity measurement.
    Simeon-Rudolf V; Evans RT
    Arh Hig Rada Toksikol; 2001 Nov; 52(3):299-305. PubMed ID: 11770327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Estimates of measurement uncertainty from proficiency testing schemes, internal laboratory quality monitoring and during routine enforcement examination of foods.
    Jarvis B; Corry JE; Hedges AJ
    J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Aug; 103(2):462-7. PubMed ID: 17650207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. External quality assessment in therapeutic drug monitoring: an Italian experience.
    Borsotti M; Valenza T
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1991; 27(3):517-21. PubMed ID: 1809074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Determination of reference method values by isotope dilution-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry: a five years' experience of two European Reference Laboratories.
    Thienpont LM; Van Nieuwenhove B; Stöckl D; Reinauer H; De Leenheer AP
    Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1996 Oct; 34(10):853-60. PubMed ID: 8933112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Lebanese External Quality Assessment Scheme for laboratories: was it worth establishing?
    Hallak G
    J Med Liban; 2005; 53(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 16398207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. External quality assessment of serum enzyme activity assays and the effect of calibration on interlaboratory concordance.
    Bullock DG; Moss DW; Whitehead TP
    Ann Clin Biochem; 1986 Sep; 23 ( Pt 5)():577-84. PubMed ID: 3767296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of the results from two different External Quality Assessment Schemes supports the utility of robust quality specifications.
    Carobene A; Franzini C; Ceriotti F
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 Jul; 49(7):1143-9. PubMed ID: 21574887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An approach for estimating measurement uncertainty in medical laboratories using data from long-term quality control and external quality assessment schemes.
    Padoan A; Antonelli G; Aita A; Sciacovelli L; Plebani M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2017 Oct; 55(11):1696-1701. PubMed ID: 28245184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Analytical performance specifications for external quality assessment - definitions and descriptions.
    Jones GRD; Albarede S; Kesseler D; MacKenzie F; Mammen J; Pedersen M; Stavelin A; Thelen M; Thomas A; Twomey PJ; Ventura E; Panteghini M;
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2017 Jun; 55(7):949-955. PubMed ID: 28593915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accuracy and reproducibility of automated estradiol-17beta and progesterone assays using native serum samples: results obtained in the Belgian external assessment scheme.
    Coucke W; Devleeschouwer N; Libeer JC; Schiettecatte J; Martin M; Smitz J
    Hum Reprod; 2007 Dec; 22(12):3204-9. PubMed ID: 18025029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Evaluation of Viva-E drug testing system].
    Chung HS; Lee ST; Lee SY
    Korean J Lab Med; 2007 Oct; 27(5):330-7. PubMed ID: 18094597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Quality control in therapeutic drug monitoring: intralaboratory precision and medical requirements.
    Gerson B
    Ther Drug Monit; 1980; 2(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 7222177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Italian external quality assessment scheme for trace element analysis in body fluids.
    Menditto A; Patriarca M; Chiodo F; Morisi G
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1996; 32(2):261-70. PubMed ID: 8913045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.