These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7014548)

  • 1. Effects of the human intestinal flora on germ-free mice.
    Hazenberg MP; Bakker M; Verschoor-Burggraaf A
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1981 Feb; 50(1):95-106. PubMed ID: 7014548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The relation between the intestinal microflora and intestinal parameters in mice.
    Koopman JP; Janssen FG; van Druten JA
    Z Versuchstierkd; 1977; 19(1-2):54-61. PubMed ID: 16415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Production of gnotobiotic mice with normal physiological functions. I. Selection of useful bacteria from feces of conventional mice.
    Itoh K; Mitsuoka T
    Z Versuchstierkd; 1980; 22(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 7008433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The 'normalization' of germ-free rabbits with host-specific caecal microflora.
    Boot R; Koopman JP; Kruijt BC; Lammers RM; Kennis HM; Lankhorst A; Mullink JW; Stadhouders AM; De Boer H; Welling GW
    Lab Anim; 1985 Oct; 19(4):344-52. PubMed ID: 4068663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 'Normalization' of germfree mice with anaerobically cultured caecal flora of 'normal' mice.
    Koopman JP; Kennis HM; Mullink JW; Prins RA; Stadhouders AM; De Boer H; Hectors MP
    Lab Anim; 1984 Apr; 18(2):188-94. PubMed ID: 6379286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Competitive effects of intestinal microflora on Vibrio cholerae in gnotobiotic mice.
    Miller CE; Feeley JC
    Lab Anim Sci; 1975 Aug; 25(4):454-8. PubMed ID: 807775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of bacterial flora on cecal size and transit rate of intestinal contents in mice.
    Iwai H; Ishihara Y; Yamanaka J; Ito T
    Jpn J Exp Med; 1973 Aug; 43(4):297-305. PubMed ID: 4580917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Survival and implantation of Escherichia coli in the intestinal tract.
    Freter R; Brickner H; Fekete J; Vickerman MM; Carey KE
    Infect Immun; 1983 Feb; 39(2):686-703. PubMed ID: 6339389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of age and isolation on the intestinal flora of mice.
    Pesti L; Gordon HA
    Gerontologia; 1973; 19(3):153-61. PubMed ID: 4587299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Silver and intestinal flora: Roles in bacterial colonization of burn wounds.
    Gravens DL; Margraf HW; Gravens CK; Thomerson JE; Butcher HR
    Arch Surg; 1969 Oct; 99(4):454-8. PubMed ID: 4980099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimental Shigella infections in laboratory animals. I. Antagonism by human normal flora components in gnotobiotic mice.
    Maier BR; Hentges DJ
    Infect Immun; 1972 Aug; 6(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 4631914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of erythromycin on microbial antagonisms: a study in gnotobiotic mice associated with a human fecal flora.
    Andremont A; Raibaud P; Tancrède C
    J Infect Dis; 1983 Sep; 148(3):579-87. PubMed ID: 6413596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intestinal "normalization" of germ-free rabbits with rabbit caecal microflora: effect of dosing regimens.
    Boot R; Koopman JP; Lankhorst A; Stadhouders AM; Welling GW; Hectors MP
    Z Versuchstierkd; 1989; 32(2):83-6. PubMed ID: 2756799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficiency of various bacterial suspensions derived from cecal floras of conventional chickens in reducing the population level of Salmonella typhimurium in gnotobiotic mice and chicken intestines.
    Hudault S; Bewa H; Bridonneau C; Raibaud P
    Can J Microbiol; 1985 Sep; 31(9):832-8. PubMed ID: 3910208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Function of various intestinal bacteria in converting germfree mice to the normal state.
    Freter R; Abrams GD
    Infect Immun; 1972 Aug; 6(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 4631910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of normal mouse intestinal bacteria on caecal weight in mice.
    Koopman JP; Kennis HM
    Z Versuchstierkd; 1980; 22(4):224-9. PubMed ID: 7467893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Role of intestinal anaerobic bacteria in colonization resistance.
    Wells CL; Maddaus MA; Jechorek RP; Simmons RL
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1988 Feb; 7(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 3132368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Isolation of the cecal microflora of mice and comparison between the gastro-intestinal and the fecal microfloras.
    Koopman JP; Janssen FG; van Druten JA
    Z Versuchstierkd; 1977; 19(1-2):62-70. PubMed ID: 860613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bifidobacteria and Escherichia coli translocation in gnotobiotic mice.
    Kmet V; Kmetová M; Contrepois M; Ribot Y
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 1995; 371A():479-82. PubMed ID: 8525971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The reduction of N-hydroxy-4-acetylaminobiphenyl by the intestinal microflora of the rat.
    Wheeler LA; Soderberg FB; Goldman P
    Cancer Res; 1975 Nov; 35(11 Pt 1):2962-8. PubMed ID: 1182690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.