These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7016913)
1. Laboratory evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Freeman JW; Rowland RW; Overman SB; Goodman NL J Clin Microbiol; 1981 May; 13(5):895-8. PubMed ID: 7016913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Crystal Enteric/Nonfermenter system, API 20E system, and Vitek AutoMicrobic system for identification of gram-negative bacilli. Robinson A; McCarter YS; Tetreault J J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Feb; 33(2):364-70. PubMed ID: 7714193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical laboratory evaluation of the Auto-Microbic system for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Hasyn JJ; Cundy KR; Dietz CC; Wong W J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Mar; 13(3):491-7. PubMed ID: 7016898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical laboratory evaluation of the automicrobic system Enterobacteriaceae biochemical card. Davis JR; Stager CE; Wende RD; Qadri SM J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Oct; 14(4):370-5. PubMed ID: 7026606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the autoSCAN-W/A rapid bacterial identification system and the Vitek AutoMicrobic system for identification of gram-negative bacilli. Pfaller MA; Sahm D; O'Hara C; Ciaglia C; Yu M; Yamane N; Scharnweber G; Rhoden D J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Jul; 29(7):1422-8. PubMed ID: 1885737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of four rapid methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae from blood cultures. Malloy PJ; Ducate MJ; Schreckenberger PC J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Mar; 17(3):493-9. PubMed ID: 6841583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Parallel comparison of accuracy of API 20E, Vitek GNI, MicroScan Walk/Away Rapid ID, and Becton Dickinson Cobas Micro ID-E/NF for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and common gram-negative, non-glucose-fermenting bacilli. O'Hara CM; Tenover FC; Miller JM J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Dec; 31(12):3165-9. PubMed ID: 8308108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the automicrobic system with API, enterotube, micro-ID, micro-media systems, and conventional methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Kelly MT; Latimer JM J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Nov; 12(5):659-62. PubMed ID: 7024296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the Sensititre system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Staneck JL; Vincelette J; Lamothe F; Polk EA J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Apr; 17(4):647-54. PubMed ID: 6343422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the DMS Rapid E system for identification of clinical isolates of the family Enterobacteriaceae. Keville MW; Doern GV J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Nov; 20(5):1010-1. PubMed ID: 6392317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of API 20E System and Encise Enterotube for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae of animal origin. Devenish JA; Barnum DA Can J Comp Med; 1980 Jul; 44(3):315-9. PubMed ID: 7000321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the four-hour rapid 20E system for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae. Izard D; Husson MO; Vincent P; Leclerc H; Monget D; Boeufgras JM J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Jul; 20(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 6378967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the API rapid E four-hour system with the API 20E overnight system for the identification of routine clinical isolates of the family Enterobacteriaceae. Overman TL; Plumley D; Overman SB; Goodman NL J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Apr; 21(4):542-5. PubMed ID: 3886691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the Quantum II Bacterial Identification System and the AutoMicrobic System for the identification of gram-negative bacilli. Pfaller MA; Bale MJ; Schulte KR; Koontz FP J Clin Microbiol; 1986 Jan; 23(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 3517034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation studies of entero-set 20, API 20E and conventional media systems for Enterobacteriaceae identification. Aldridge KE; Hodges RL J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Jan; 13(1):120-5. PubMed ID: 7007414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reevaluation of the API 20E identification system versus conventional biochemicals for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae: a new look at an old product. O'Hara CM; Rhoden DL; Miller JM J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Jan; 30(1):123-5. PubMed ID: 1734043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical evaluation of the MICRO-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems for identification of Enterobacteriacea. Edberg SC; Atkinson B; Chambers C; Moore MH; Palumbo L; Zorzon CF; Singer JM J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Aug; 10(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 389946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative evaluation of the Eiken and API 20E systems and conventional methods for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae. Castillo CB; Bruckner DA J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Oct; 20(4):754-7. PubMed ID: 6490860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of an automated, computerized system (automicrobic system) for Enterobacteriaceae identification. Burdash NM; Teti G; West ME; Bannister ER; Manos JP J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Feb; 13(2):331-4. PubMed ID: 7009640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accurate automated identification of selected Enterobacteriaceae at four hours. Ferraro MJ; Edelblut MA; Kunz LJ J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Jan; 13(1):151-7. PubMed ID: 7007419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]