These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7016913)

  • 21. Comparative evaluation of the API 20S system and the automicrobic system gram-positive identification card for species identification of streptococci.
    Appelbaum PC; Jacobs MR; Heald JI; Palko WM; Duffett A; Crist R; Naugle PA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Feb; 19(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 6365955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of the repliscan system for Enterobacteriaceae identification.
    Woolfrey BF; Quall CO; Fox JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Jan; 13(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 7007430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system for identification of glucose-nonfermenting gram-negative rods.
    Smith SM; Cundy KR; Gilardi GL; Wong W
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Feb; 15(2):302-7. PubMed ID: 7040451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of the Microbact-12E and 24E systems and the API-20E system for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Mugg P; Hill A
    J Hyg (Lond); 1981 Oct; 87(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 7026673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparison of two commerical methods for the identification of the Enterobacteriaceae--API 20E and the Enterotube--with conventional methods.
    Hayek LJ; Willis GW
    J Clin Pathol; 1976 Feb; 29(2):158-61. PubMed ID: 777035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Supplementary rapid biochemical test panel for the API 20E bacterial identification system.
    Edinger RC; Migneault PC; Nolte FS
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Dec; 22(6):1063-5. PubMed ID: 3905846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system Yeast Biochemical Card for rapid identification of medically important yeasts.
    Oblack DL; Rhodes JC; Martin WJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Feb; 13(2):351-5. PubMed ID: 7009641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Update and evaluation of the AutoMicrobic yeast identification system.
    Land G; Stotler R; Land K; Staneck J
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Oct; 20(4):649-52. PubMed ID: 6386872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of the Repliscan II System for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Woolfrey BF; Fox JM; Quall CO
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Oct; 14(4):408-10. PubMed ID: 7026608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of the automicrobic system gram-positive identification card for species identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci.
    Almeida RJ; Jorgensen JH; Johnson JE
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Aug; 18(2):438-9. PubMed ID: 6352738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Identification of Enterobacteriaceae by the automicrobic system: Enterobacteriaceae biochemical cards versus Enterobacteriaceae-plus biochemical cards.
    Barry AL; Badal RE
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Apr; 15(4):575-81. PubMed ID: 7040456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Use of the automicrobic and enteric-tek systems for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Goldstein J; Guarneri JJ; Della-Latta P; Scherer J
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Apr; 15(4):654-9. PubMed ID: 7040462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Collaborative investigation of the AutoMicrobic System Enterobacteriaceae biochemical card.
    Isenberg HD; Gavan TL; Smith PB; Sonnenwirth A; Taylor W; Martin WJ; Rhoden D; Balows A
    J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Jun; 11(6):694-702. PubMed ID: 7000819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system for identification and susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli.
    Woolfrey BF; Lally RT; Ederer MN; Quall CO
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Dec; 20(6):1053-9. PubMed ID: 6520216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of micro-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems in identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Aldridge KE; Gardner BB; Clark SJ; Matsen JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1978 Jun; 7(6):507-13. PubMed ID: 353065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of micro-ID and API 20E in rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Gooch WM; Hill GA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 May; 15(5):885-90. PubMed ID: 7047556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Inoculation of API-20E from positive blood cultures.
    Blazevic DJ; Trombley CM; Lund ME
    J Clin Microbiol; 1976 Dec; 4(6):522-3. PubMed ID: 826548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of Micro-ID and API 20E systems for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Blazevic DJ; Mackay DL; Warwood NM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1979 May; 9(5):605-8. PubMed ID: 383748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Rapid and automated identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the abbott MS-2 system and API-20E versus conventional methods.
    Izard D; Savage C; Enayeh E; Leclerc H; Troonen H
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 May; 252(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 6750982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparative evaluation of the API 20S and AutoMicrobic gram-positive identification systems for non-beta-hemolytic streptococci and aerococci.
    Facklam R; Bosley GS; Rhoden D; Franklin AR; Weaver N; Schulman R
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Apr; 21(4):535-41. PubMed ID: 3886690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.