These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7017419)
1. NIH censure for Dr Martin Cline: tighter rules for future research plans. Dickson D Nature; 1981 Jun; 291(5814):369. PubMed ID: 7017419 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cline stripped of research grants. Dickson D Nature; 1981 Dec; 294(5840):391-2. PubMed ID: 11643675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Martin Cline loses appeal on NIH grant. Sun M Science; 1982 Oct; 218(4567):37. PubMed ID: 7123214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cline loses two NIH grants. Sun M Science; 1981 Dec; 214(4526):1220. PubMed ID: 7302590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Public regulation of recombinant dna gene therapy. McGarity TO; Shapiro SA J Leg Med; 1982 Jun; 3(2):185-210. PubMed ID: 6981676 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Recombinant DNA research: beyond the NIH guidelines. Grobstein C Science; 1976 Dec; 194(4270):1133-5. PubMed ID: 1069374 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. NIH guidelines for research involving recombinant DNA molecules. Wilson DJ Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):177-85. PubMed ID: 11652293 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. From Asilomar to industrial biotechnology: risks, reductionism and regulation. Krimsky S Sci Cult (Lond); 2005 Dec; 14(4):309-23. PubMed ID: 16619467 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Genetic engineering: picking up the pieces. Budiansky S Nature; 1984 May 31-Jun 6; 309(5967):391. PubMed ID: 6587189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recombinant DNA research: proposed actions under guidelines. US National Institutes of Health Fed Regist; 1984 Sep; 49(184):37016-7. PubMed ID: 11645519 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The challenge of biotechnology. Gore A; Owens S Yale Law Policy Rev; 1985; 3(2):336-57. PubMed ID: 11652468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. If it's research, it must be reviewed: an NIH reprimand. Levine C Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Feb; 16(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 11643913 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Evolution of the NIH guidelines. Milewski EA Recomb DNA Tech Bull; 1981 Dec; 4(4):160-5. PubMed ID: 7029672 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Gene therapy caught in more entanglements. Wade N Science; 1981 Apr; 212(4490):24-5. PubMed ID: 6259731 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Genetic manipulation: NIH concede part of Rifkin suit. Budiansky S Nature; 1984 Nov 8-14; 312(5990):91. PubMed ID: 6594575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Cambridge model: how public oversight of biotech is good for everyone--even business. Lipson S Genewatch; 2003; 16(5):7-10. PubMed ID: 15025120 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The NIH trials of growth hormone for short stature. Tauer CA IRB; 1994 May; 16(3):1-9. PubMed ID: 11659923 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Is self-regulation enough today?: Evaluating the recombinant DNA controversy. Weiner C Health Matrix Clevel; 1999; 9(2):289-302. PubMed ID: 10787474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Gene panel rejects ban: interspecies transfer seen useful by NIH. Russell C Washington Post; 1984 Oct; ():A8. PubMed ID: 11646404 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Human gene therapy: application, ethics and regulation. Baskerville G Dickinson Law Rev; 1992; 96(4):733-63. PubMed ID: 11652212 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]