BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 70178)

  • 1. Morphological differentiation of human spermatozoa with Testsimplets slides.
    Schirren C; Eckhardt U; Jachczik R; Carstensen CA
    Andrologia; 1977; 9(2):191-2. PubMed ID: 70178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of three staining methods for the morphological evaluation of human spermatozoa.
    Henkel R; Schreiber G; Sturmhoefel A; Hipler UC; Zermann DH; Menkveld R
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Feb; 89(2):449-55. PubMed ID: 17601601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the various techniques of identifying human spermatozoa morphology.
    Ragni G; Marzioli S; Levenberg A; Guercilena S
    Acta Eur Fertil; 1984; 15(6):437-40. PubMed ID: 6085603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Application of Testsimplets for classification of sperm morphology].
    Iwamoto T; Hirokawa M; Iwasaki A; Matsushita K; Asakura S
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1986 Aug; 32(8):1151-5. PubMed ID: 2431608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Human spermatozoa stained with toluidine blue-pyronine. A rapid method for differentiation.
    Schütte B
    Andrologia; 1986; 18(6):567-9. PubMed ID: 2433966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Morphometric dimensions of the human sperm head depend on the staining method used.
    Maree L; du Plessis SS; Menkveld R; van der Horst G
    Hum Reprod; 2010 Jun; 25(6):1369-82. PubMed ID: 20400771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Device for determination of horizontal linear sperm migration with subsequent fixation and staining possibilities].
    Porstmann T; Rohde W; Traut W
    Z Med Labortech; 1972; 13(5):299-301. PubMed ID: 4119330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Standardization of sample preparation, staining and sampling methods for automated sperm head morphometry analysis of boar spermatozoa.
    García-Herreros M; Aparicio IM; Barón FJ; García-Marín LJ; Gil MC
    Int J Androl; 2006 Oct; 29(5):553-63. PubMed ID: 16968497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fluorescence microscopic detection of acrosin in different morphologic types of human spermatozoa.
    Francavilla S; Bruno B; Poccia G; Francavilla F; Properzi G; Santucci R
    Andrologia; 1988; 20(4):344-50. PubMed ID: 2461664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scoring human sperm morphology using Testsimplets and Diff-Quik slides.
    Natali I; Muratori M; Sarli V; Vannuccini M; Cipriani S; Niccoli L; Giachini C
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Apr; 99(5):1227-1232.e2. PubMed ID: 23375198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of three staining techniques for the morphometric study of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) spermatozoa.
    Tuset VM; Dietrich GJ; Wojtczak M; Słowińska M; de Monserrat J; Ciereszko A
    Theriogenology; 2008 May; 69(8):1033-8. PubMed ID: 18359066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An improved technique for staining the head membranes of human spermatozoa.
    Isvarine A; Mula C
    Stain Technol; 1988 Jul; 63(4):259-60. PubMed ID: 2464213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Descriptive analysis of sperm head morphometry in Iberian ibex (Capra pyrenaica): optimum sampling procedure and staining methods using Sperm-Class Analyzer ®.
    Esteso MC; Rodríguez E; Toledano-Díaz A; Castaño C; Pradiee J; López-Sebastián A; Santiago-Moreno J
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2015 Apr; 155():42-9. PubMed ID: 25721563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparison of three methods for evaluating acrosome reaction in human spermatozoa].
    Zhang Y; Xie QX; Pan SP; Zhang CX; Xiao LJ; Peng YL
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2005 Jun; 11(6):419-21, 425. PubMed ID: 15999483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Morphological study of dog spermatozoa].
    Günzel AR; Syväri K; Krause D
    Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1985 Jan; 92(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 2578925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Morphological differentiation of human spermatozoa using pre-prepared methods. Comparative studies].
    Wernicke J; Schirren C
    Andrologia; 1982; 14(6):471-80. PubMed ID: 6187243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Ultrastructural abnormalities of the human spermatozoa: a way to study the processes of sperm differentiation].
    Escalier D
    Bull Assoc Anat (Nancy); 1991 Jun; 75(229):11-2. PubMed ID: 1777696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of human sperm morphology by strict criteria: comparison of wet preparation versus stained with the modified Diff-Quik method.
    Oral E; Yetis O; Elibol F; Senol H; Irez T; Aksu FM
    Arch Androl; 2002; 48(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 12137592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Assessment of the morphological status of human sperm].
    Stanislavov R; Kiutukchiev B
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1983; 22(5):383-6. PubMed ID: 6202166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. SpermBlue: a new universal stain for human and animal sperm which is also amenable to automated sperm morphology analysis.
    van der Horst G; Maree L
    Biotech Histochem; 2009 Dec; 84(6):299-308. PubMed ID: 19488904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.