These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7017977)

  • 1. Experimental study of double staple lines in gastric partitions.
    Eskind SJ; Massie JD; Born ML; O'Leary JP; Scott HW
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1981 Jun; 152(6):751-6. PubMed ID: 7017977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The healing and tensile strength of the gastroplasty staple line. An experimental study.
    Okudaira Y; Yang Y; Kholoussy AM; Matsumoto T
    Am Surg; 1984 Oct; 50(10):564-8. PubMed ID: 6486574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Collagen content, histology, and tensile strength: determinants of wound repair in various gastric stapling devices in a canine gastric partition model.
    Harris PL; Freedman BE; Bland KI; Miller GJ; Seeger JM; Woodward ER
    J Surg Res; 1987 Apr; 42(4):411-7. PubMed ID: 3573766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new stapler-based full-thickness transgastric access closure: results from an animal pilot trial.
    Magno P; Giday SA; Dray X; Chung SS; Cotton PB; Gostout CJ; Hawes RH; Kalloo AN; Pasricha PJ; White JJ; Assumpcao L; Marohn MR; Gabrielson KL; Kantsevoy SV
    Endoscopy; 2007 Oct; 39(10):876-80. PubMed ID: 17968803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laboratory evaluation of four techniques of stapled gastroplasty.
    Brolin RE
    Surgery; 1985 Jan; 97(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 3880936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experimental evaluation of techniques of gastric partitioning for morbid obesity.
    Brolin RE; Ravitch MM
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1981 Dec; 153(6):877-82. PubMed ID: 7302813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Increasing the efficacy of gastric operations for the control of morbid obesity.
    Printen KJ; Platz C; Tobin H; Lewis JW
    Am Surg; 1982 Jul; 48(7):309-15. PubMed ID: 7091918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Failure of gastric partitioning for morbid obesity.
    Moore EE
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1981 Jan; 152(1):86. PubMed ID: 7006129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sutures inserted into the gastric wall an experimental study.
    Bornemisza G; Furka I; Tarsoly E; Mikó I
    Acta Chir Hung; 1983; 24(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 6359793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Eso-gastric and eso-jejunal anastomoses with metal staples using the PKS 25 apparatus].
    Vankemmel M
    Lille Med; 1972; 17(6):850-6. PubMed ID: 4563734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [A method for forming an isolated stomach in dogs].
    Popov BG; Vasilenko LI
    Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova; 1989 Dec; 75(12):1791-3. PubMed ID: 2697603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of burst pressure between buttressed versus non-buttressed staple-lines in an animal model.
    Arnold W; Shikora SA
    Obes Surg; 2005 Feb; 15(2):164-71. PubMed ID: 15802057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In-continuity gastrointestinal stapling.
    Mulholland MW; Magallanes F; Quigley TM; Delaney JP
    Dis Colon Rectum; 1983 Sep; 26(9):586-9. PubMed ID: 6347569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Stenosis complications in digestive surgery: a histomorphological contribution. Comparison of mechanical and manual sutures].
    Grassi F; Frateschi C; Caldarelli C; Spisni R; Pingitore R; Cantile C; Cancetti F
    Minerva Chir; 1998 Mar; 53(3):129-34. PubMed ID: 9617107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Does the third staple line of a new endostapler offer an advantage?].
    Czymek R; Keller R; Hildebrand P; Bouchard R; Bader FG; Jungbluth T; Mirow L; Roblick UJ; Bruch HP
    Zentralbl Chir; 2009 Jun; 134(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 19536721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Billroth I anastomosis with biodegradable anastomosis ring in the animal model].
    Dietz UA; Debus ES; Hirt AL; Czeczko NG; Nassif PA; Repka JC; Malafaia S; Geiger D; Thiede A
    Zentralbl Chir; 1999; 124(9):854-8. PubMed ID: 10544495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the use of 3.5-mm and 4.8-mm staples in gastric surgery.
    Kunisaki C; Makino H; Takagawa R; Yamamoto N; Nagano Y; Fujii S; Kosaka T; Ono HA; Akiyama H; Shimada H
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2008; 55(86-87):1943-7. PubMed ID: 19102428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Staple line reinforcement with new biomaterial increased burst strength pressure: an animal study.
    Pinheiro JS; Correa JL; Cohen RV; Novaes JA; Schiavon CA
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2006; 2(3):397-9, discussion 400. PubMed ID: 16925361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transluminal closure for NOTES: an ex vivo study comparing leak pressures of various gastrotomy and colotomy closure modalities.
    Ryou M; Fong DG; Pai RD; Rattner DW; Thompson CC
    Endoscopy; 2008 May; 40(5):432-6. PubMed ID: 18404600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experience with auto suture surgical stapling instruments. Fate of enterically applied staples.
    Schwarzbart G; Lubin J
    Int Surg; 1978 Mar; 63(3):146-51. PubMed ID: 344252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.