These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up. Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An in vitro study on the secondary caries-prevention properties of three restorative materials. Lai GY; Zhu LK; Li MY; Wang J J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):363-8. PubMed ID: 23998624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An in vitro study into the effect of a bacterial artificial caries system on the enamel adjacent to composite and amalgam restorations. Gilmour AS; Edmunds DH; Newcombe RG; Clark MF Caries Res; 1993; 27(3):169-75. PubMed ID: 8519054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anaerobic microflora under Class I and Class II composite and amalgam restorations. Splieth C; Bernhardt O; Heinrich A; Bernhardt H; Meyer G Quintessence Int; 2003; 34(7):497-503. PubMed ID: 12946067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical performance of sealed composite restorations placed over caries compared with sealed and unsealed amalgam restorations. Mertz-Fairhurst EJ; Call-Smith KM; Shuster GS; Williams JE; Davis QB; Smith CD; Bell RA; Sherrer JD; Myers DR; Morse PK J Am Dent Assoc; 1987 Nov; 115(5):689-94. PubMed ID: 3479490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ultraconservative and cariostatic sealed restorations: results at year 10. Mertz-Fairhurst EJ; Curtis JW; Ergle JW; Rueggeberg FA; Adair SM J Am Dent Assoc; 1998 Jan; 129(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 9448347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microbiological analysis after complete or partial removal of carious dentin in primary teeth: a randomized clinical trial. Lula EC; Monteiro-Neto V; Alves CM; Ribeiro CC Caries Res; 2009; 43(5):354-8. PubMed ID: 19648746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]