These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 702005)
21. Relieving pain and foreseeing death: a paradox about accountability and blame. Nuccetelli S; Seay G J Law Med Ethics; 2000; 28(1):19-25, 2. PubMed ID: 11067628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. On Immanuel Jakobovits: bringing the ancient word to the modern world. Gellman M Second Opin; 1991 Jul; 17(1):97-117. PubMed ID: 11645697 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The ethical standards for withholding/withdrawing nutrition and hydration. Connery JR Issues Law Med; 1986 Sep; 2(2):87-97. PubMed ID: 3639841 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Toward a sound moral policy on abortion. Coffey PJ New Scholasticism; 1973; 47(1):105-12. PubMed ID: 11664211 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Actions, intentions, and consequences: the doctrine of double effect. Quinn WS Philos Public Aff; 1989; 18(4):334-51. PubMed ID: 11659159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Supportive care and euthanasia--an ethical dilemma? Volkenandt M Support Care Cancer; 1998 Mar; 6(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 9540169 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Should nutrition and hydration be provided to permanently unconscious and other mentally disabled persons? O'Rourke K Issues Law Med; 1989; 5(2):181-96. PubMed ID: 2621090 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The rights and wrongs of abortion: a reply to Judith Thomson. Finnis J Philos Public Aff; 1973; 2(2):117-45. PubMed ID: 11663360 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Covert video surveillance and the principle of double effect: a response to criticism. Shinebourne EA J Med Ethics; 1996 Feb; 22(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 8932722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Deontological foundations for medical ethics? Gillon R Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 May; 290(6478):1331-3. PubMed ID: 3922480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Indirectly intended life-shortening analgesia: clarifying the principles. Barry FR; Maher JE Issues Law Med; 1990; 6(2):117-51. PubMed ID: 1699909 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The confused, the voiceless, the perverse: shall we give them food and drink. Meilaender G Issues Law Med; 1986 Sep; 2(2):133-48. PubMed ID: 3095262 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Two challenges to the double effect doctrine: euthanasia and abortion. Shaw AB J Med Ethics; 2002 Apr; 28(2):102-4. PubMed ID: 11934939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. 'Abortion pill' RU 486: ethics, rhetoric, and social practice. Cahill LS Hastings Cent Rep; 1987; 17(5):5-8. PubMed ID: 3692808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Life-support and end-of-life questions: treatment or intervention? Welk TA J Intraven Nurs; 1995; 18(4):191-7. PubMed ID: 7629639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Killing and letting die -- putting the debate in context. Chandler J Australas J Philos; 1990 Dec; 68(4):420-31. PubMed ID: 11659437 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. May society intervene to protect the health of a fetus? McDonough MP Ethics Medics; 1982 Dec; 7(12):1-2. PubMed ID: 11653477 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]