These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7020591)

  • 1. Impact of verification media and resuscitation on accuracy of the membrane filter total coliform enumeration technique.
    Evans TM; Seidler RJ; LeChevallier MW
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1981 May; 41(5):1144-51. PubMed ID: 7020591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of verification procedures for the membrane filter total coliform technique.
    LeChevallier MW; Cameron SC; McFeters GA
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1983 Mar; 45(3):1126-8. PubMed ID: 6342533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Underestimation of total-coliform counts by the membrane filter verification procedure.
    Standridge JH; Delfino JJ
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1982 Oct; 44(4):1001-3. PubMed ID: 7149709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of media for recovery of total coliform bacteria from chemically treated water.
    Rice EW; Fox KR; Nash HD; Read EJ; Smith AP
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1987 Jul; 53(7):1571-3. PubMed ID: 3662507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of noncoliforms on coliform detection in potable groundwater: improved recovery with an anaerobic membrane filter technique.
    Franzblau SG; Hinnebusch BJ; Kelley LM; Sinclair NA
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1984 Jul; 48(1):142-8. PubMed ID: 6383216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New medium for improved recovery of coliform bacteria from drinking water.
    LeChevallier MW; Cameron SC; McFeters GA
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1983 Feb; 45(2):484-92. PubMed ID: 6338827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of factors affecting the membrane filter technique for testing drinking water.
    Hsu SC; Williams TJ
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1982 Aug; 44(2):453-60. PubMed ID: 6751233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enumeration of coliform bacteria in wastewater solids using defined substrate technology.
    Kramer TA; Liu J
    Water Environ Res; 2002; 74(6):526-30. PubMed ID: 12540092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative performance of Colisure.
    McFeters GA; Broadaway SC; Pyle BH; Pickett M; Egozy Y
    J Am Water Works Assoc; 1997 Sep; 89(9):112-20. PubMed ID: 11540632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison between minerals-modified glutamate medium and lauryl tryptose lactose broth for the enumeration of Escherichia coli and coliform organisms in water by the multiple tube method.
    J Hyg (Lond); 1980 Aug; 85(1):35-49. PubMed ID: 6762395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Failure of the most-probable-number technique to detect coliforms in drinking water and raw water supplies.
    Evans TM; Waarvick CE; Seidler RJ; LeChevallier MW
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1981 Jan; 41(1):130-8. PubMed ID: 7013694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection and enumeration of coliforms in drinking water: current methods and emerging approaches.
    Rompré A; Servais P; Baudart J; de-Roubin MR; Laurent P
    J Microbiol Methods; 2002 Mar; 49(1):31-54. PubMed ID: 11777581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Coliform species recovered from untreated surface water and drinking water by the membrane filter, standard, and modified most-probable-number techniques.
    Evans TM; LeChevallier MW; Waarvick CE; Seidler RJ
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1981 Mar; 41(3):657-63. PubMed ID: 7013706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification of coliform genera recovered from water using different technologies.
    Fricker CR; Eldred BJ
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2009 Dec; 49(6):685-8. PubMed ID: 19874482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of methods for determining the numbers and species distribution of coliform bacteria in well water samples.
    Niemi RM; Heikkilä MP; Lahti K; Kalso S; Niemelä SI
    J Appl Microbiol; 2001 Jun; 90(6):850-8. PubMed ID: 11412314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative study of several culture media to determine coliforms and E. coli in dairy and cocoa products.
    Bindschedler O; De Man JC; Curiat G
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Naturwiss; 1981; 136(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 7018121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of standard and modified M-FC, MacConkey, and Teepol media for membrane filtration counting of fecal coliforms in water.
    Grabow WO; Hilner CA; Coubrough P
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1981 Aug; 42(2):192-9. PubMed ID: 7025755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. False positive fecal coliform in biosolid samples assayed using A-1 medium.
    Baker KH; Redmond B; Herson DS
    Water Environ Res; 2005; 77(4):423-4. PubMed ID: 16121511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of confirmatory media for coliform organisms and Escherichia coli in water. By a joint committee of the Public Health Laboratory Service and the Standing Committee of Analysts.
    J Hyg (Lond); 1981 Dec; 87(3):369-75. PubMed ID: 7031125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pollution indicator bacteria associated with municipal raw and drinking water supplies.
    Clark JA; Pagel JE
    Can J Microbiol; 1977 Apr; 23(4):465-70. PubMed ID: 324588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.