These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7022912)

  • 1. Cells infiltrating rejected human kidney allograft: composition and in vitro functional capacities.
    Charpentier B; Lang P; Martin B; Fries D
    Transplant Proc; 1981 Mar; 13(1 Pt 1):84-9. PubMed ID: 7022912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity and spontaneous cytotoxicity of peripheral blood lymphocytes of organ recipients and cells infiltrating the kidney allogeneic transplant].
    Drannik GN; Baran EIa; Seniuk OF; Driianskaia VE
    Fiziol Zh (1978); 1989; 35(5):68-72. PubMed ID: 2591583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Regulation of human allograft rejection: kidney-infiltrating suppressor inducer and suppressor effector T-cells are reduced during rejection.
    Tötterman TH; Hanås E; Larsson E; Sjöberg O; Tufveson G
    Transplant Proc; 1989 Feb; 21(1 Pt 1):359-60. PubMed ID: 2523133
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro and in vivo human T cell repertoire in kidney allograft rejection.
    Finn OJ; Miceli MC; Sanfilippo A; Bollinger RR; Barry TS
    Transplant Proc; 1988 Apr; 20(2):155-8. PubMed ID: 3284032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Immunoexpression of perforin and granzyme B on infiltrating lymphocytes in human renal acute allograft rejection.
    Wagrowska-Danilewicz M; Danilewicz M
    Nefrologia; 2003; 23(6):538-44. PubMed ID: 15002789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Different functional activities of T cell lines isolated from a rejected renal allograft and peripheral blood lymphocytes of renal transplant recipients.
    Miltenburg AM; Meijer-Paape ME; Daha MR; Paul LC
    Transplant Proc; 1988 Apr; 20(2):298-9. PubMed ID: 2966469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Superiority of in vitro nondonor-specific immune monitoring over donor-specific assays in detecting a prerejection state.
    Kirchoff C; McGeorge M; Thomas FT; Mendez-Picon G; Thomas JM; Lower RR; Lee HM
    Surg Forum; 1979; 30():297-9. PubMed ID: 120020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Immunological diagnosis of the kidney allograft rejection reaction].
    Drannik GN
    Urol Nefrol (Mosk); 1981; (5):64-71. PubMed ID: 6458144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Immunologic monitoring in the diagnosis of renal allograft rejection.
    Gailiunas P; Suthanthiran M; Person A; Carpenter CB; Garovoy MR
    Transplant Proc; 1977 Dec; 9(4):1823-5. PubMed ID: 341443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Double-staining analysis of mononuclear cells infiltrating rejected kidney.
    Takeda I; Horimi T; Okabayashi T; Kaneda M; Shimoyama H; Chohno S; Tanaka I; Miyake N; Orita K
    Transplant Proc; 1988 Apr; 20(2):211-3. PubMed ID: 3284043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monoclonal antibody identification of nucleated cells in urine: diagnosis of allograft rejection.
    Segasothy M; Birch DF; Fairley KF; Kincaid-Smith P
    Transplant Proc; 1989 Feb; 21(1 Pt 2):1878-9. PubMed ID: 2652610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Functional analysis of lymphocytes recovered from human allograft undergoing rejection.
    Caillat S; Poisson J; Campos H; Debure A; Kreis H; Bach JF; Chatenoud L
    Transplant Proc; 1987 Feb; 19(1 Pt 1):389-91. PubMed ID: 3274790
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Allograft infiltrating cytotoxic T lymphocytes recognize kidney-specific human minor histocompatibility antigens.
    Poindexter N; Shenoy S; Howard T; Flye MW; Mohanakumar T
    Clin Transplant; 1997 Jun; 11(3):174-7. PubMed ID: 9193838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Construction of rat-mouse T hybridoma clones from rat kidney allograft-infiltrating cells with helper activity.
    Manca F; Haalttunen J; Ferry B; Jaakkola M; Gessaga M; Häyry P
    Transplant Proc; 1988 Apr; 20(2):159-60. PubMed ID: 2966465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Antibodies eluted from rejected human renal allografts: specificity to B lymphocytes, monocytes, primary kidney cells, and endothelial cells.
    Lee HM; Waldrep JC; Mendez-Picon G; Mohanakumar T
    Transplant Proc; 1981 Mar; 13(1 Pt 1):108-10. PubMed ID: 7022806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Propagation and characterization of lymphocytes infiltrating renal allografts.
    Bachetoni A; Cinti P; Poli L; Bruzzone P; Alfani D; Molajoni ER; Cortesini R
    Transplant Proc; 1993 Jun; 25(3):2317-9. PubMed ID: 8516914
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative flow cytometric analysis of peripheral blood, graft infiltrating and urinary sediment cells during kidney allograft rejection.
    Ciniti P; Evangelista B; Speziale A; Ingenito L; Orlandini AM; Baiano V; Renna Molajoni E; Cortesini R
    Transplant Proc; 1995 Feb; 27(1):919-21. PubMed ID: 7879229
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Four patterns of human renal allograft rejection: a cytologic and in vitro analysis of the infiltrate in 24 irreversibly rejected kidneys.
    Busch GJ; Schamberg JF; Moretz RC; Strom TB; Tilney NL; Carpenter CB
    Transplant Proc; 1977 Mar; 9(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 325780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Low frequency of infiltrating cells intensely expressing T cell cytokine mRNA in human renal allograft rejection.
    Grimm PC; McKenna RM; Gospodarek EM; Jeffery JR; Rush DN
    Transplantation; 1995 Feb; 59(4):579-84. PubMed ID: 7533348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Functional T cells in human renal allograft fine-needle aspirates.
    McKenna RM; Heiman D; Rush DN; Jeffrey JR
    Transplant Proc; 1988 Dec; 20(6):1237-8. PubMed ID: 3059612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.