These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7023560)

  • 1. Carcinogenic risk assessment: a guide to the literature.
    Krewski D; Brown C
    Biometrics; 1981 Jun; 37(2):353-66. PubMed ID: 7023560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Criteria, rules and procedures adopted by IARC in evaluating risks from different carcinogenic agents for humans].
    IARC
    Vopr Onkol; 2007; 53(6):621-41. PubMed ID: 18416130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Problems in the assessment of carcinogenic risk of dioxins].
    Khripach LV; Zhurkov VS; Revazova IuA; Rakhmanin IuA
    Gig Sanit; 2005; (6):24-7. PubMed ID: 16404878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk assessment of carcinogenic chemicals in The Netherlands. Health Council of The Netherlands: Committee on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenicity of Chemical Substances.
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1994 Feb; 19(1):14-30. PubMed ID: 8159812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Models for carcinogenic risk assessment.
    Science; 1978 Dec; 202(4372):1105-9. PubMed ID: 715463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans: a list of the IARC.
    Kuroki T
    Jpn J Cancer Res; 1994 May; 85(5):inside frontcover. PubMed ID: 8014099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Physical and chemical agents and carcinogenic risk.
    Somers E
    Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1980; 14(2):172-84. PubMed ID: 7417743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Identification of human carcinogenic risks in IARC monographs].
    Vainio H; Wilbourn JD; Sasco AJ; Partensky C; Gaudin N; Heseltine E; Eragne I
    Bull Cancer; 1995; 82(5):339-48. PubMed ID: 7626841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Hygienic assessment of the hazard of ambient air carcinogenic factors].
    Litvichenko ON; Chernichenko IA; Kovalenko TV; Zinchenko GG
    Gig Sanit; 2007; (1):14-7. PubMed ID: 17343044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The assessment of low-dose carcinogenicity.
    Armitage P
    Biometrics; 1982 Mar; 38 Suppl():119-39. PubMed ID: 7046818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Individual susceptibility to occupational carcinogens: the evidence from biomonitoring and molecular epidemiology studies].
    Pavanello S; Clonfero E
    G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2004; 26(4):311-21. PubMed ID: 15584438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Chloroform mode of action: implications for cancer risk assessment.
    Golden RJ; Holm SE; Robinson DE; Julkunen PH; Reese EA
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1997 Oct; 26(2):142-55. PubMed ID: 9356278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Problems in assessing carcinogenic risk of exposure to chemical pollution of the environment].
    Novikov SM; Rumiantsev GN; Zholdakova ZI; Shashina EA; Ponomareva OV
    Gig Sanit; 1998; (1):29-34. PubMed ID: 9560935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The concept of environmental pollution for emission control in regulating carcinogenic air pollutants in outdoor air].
    Kappos AD; Schmitt OA
    Gesundheitswesen; 1993 Jan; 55(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 8435544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Carcinogens and the Law 626/94: examples of application related to Title VII].
    Zocchetti C; Della Foglia M; Cavallo D
    Med Lav; 1998; 89(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 9673100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of DNA adducts to identify human health risk from exposure to hazardous environmental pollutants: the increasing role of mass spectrometry in assessing biologically effective doses of genotoxic carcinogens.
    Farmer PB; Singh R
    Mutat Res; 2008; 659(1-2):68-76. PubMed ID: 18468947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Criteria for conducting quantitative risk assessments for silica.
    Goldsmith DF; Hertz-Picciotto I
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1997; 7(3):367-75. PubMed ID: 9246598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Biological monitoring and risk assessment].
    Lotti M; Maroni M; Pira E
    G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2004; 26(4):331-3. PubMed ID: 15584440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Assessment of the cancerogenic risk in schools].
    Monti C; Bacaloni A; D'Onofrio A; Fiaschetti M; Filippelli C; Tomei F; Sacchi L; Vacca D; Tomei G; Giubilati R; Casale T; Pimpinella B; Sordello G; Tomei F
    Ann Ig; 2008; 20(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 18478674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Environmental pollution and carcinogenic risk.
    Karaer F
    J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol; 1996; 15(2-4):105-13. PubMed ID: 9216793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.