87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7026120)
1. A method for short- and long-term in vivo study of the bone-implant interface.
Albrektsson T; Linder L
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1981 Sep; (159):269-73. PubMed ID: 7026120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Histomorphology of the bone-cement contact. Experimental phenomenology of the osseous reconstruction processes. I].
Draenert K; Rudigier J
Chirurg; 1978 May; 49(5):276-85. PubMed ID: 648264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of mechanoregulatory models to simulate peri-implant tissue formation in an in vivo bone chamber.
Geris L; Vandamme K; Naert I; Vander Sloten J; Duyck J; Van Oosterwyck H
J Biomech; 2008; 41(1):145-54. PubMed ID: 17706229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of micro-motion on the tissue response around immediately loaded roughened titanium implants in the rabbit.
Vandamme K; Naert I; Geris L; Vander Sloten J; Puers R; Duyck J
Eur J Oral Sci; 2007 Feb; 115(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 17305713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A repeated sampling bone chamber methodology for the evaluation of tissue differentiation and bone adaptation around titanium implants under controlled mechanical conditions.
Duyck J; Cooman MD; Puers R; Van Oosterwyck H; Sloten JV; Naert I
J Biomech; 2004 Dec; 37(12):1819-22. PubMed ID: 15519589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bone injury caused by curing bone cement. A vital microscopic study in the rabbit tibia.
Albrektsson T; Linder L
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1984 Mar; (183):280-7. PubMed ID: 6697596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surface analysis and effects on interfacial bone microhardness of collagen-coated titanium implants: a rabbit model.
Morra M; Cassinelli C; Meda L; Fini M; Giavaresi G; Giardino R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 15747670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does titanium surface treatment influence the bone-implant interface? SEM and histomorphometry in a 6-month sheep study.
Huré G; Donath K; Lesourd M; Chappard D; Baslé MF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(4):506-11. PubMed ID: 8803346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone bonding ability of bioactive bone cements.
Tamura J; Kitsugi T; Iida H; Fujita H; Nakamura T; Kokubo T; Yoshihara S
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Oct; (343):183-91. PubMed ID: 9345224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Behavior of the bone-titanium interface after push-in testing: a morphological study.
Zaffe D; Rodriguez Y Baena R; Rizzo S; Brusotti C; Soncini M; Pietrabissa R; Cavani F; Quaglini V
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2003 Feb; 64(2):365-71. PubMed ID: 12522824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of micro-motion on the tissue differentiation around immediately loaded cylindrical turned titanium implants.
Duyck J; Vandamme K; Geris L; Van Oosterwyck H; De Cooman M; Vandersloten J; Puers R; Naert I
Arch Oral Biol; 2006 Jan; 51(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 15922992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Regeneration of peri-implant infrabony defects using PerioGlas: a pilot study in rabbits.
Johnson MW; Sullivan SM; Rohrer M; Collier M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(6):835-9. PubMed ID: 9425765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Histological evaluation of the early bone response to hydroxyapatite (HA) implanted in rabbit tibia.
Khadijah K; Mashita M; Saidu MF; Fazilah F; Khalid KA
Med J Malaysia; 2004 May; 59 Suppl B():123-4. PubMed ID: 15468849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pullout strength for cannulated pedicle screws with bone cement augmentation in severely osteoporotic bone: influences of radial hole and pilot hole tapping.
Chen LH; Tai CL; Lai PL; Lee DM; Tsai TT; Fu TS; Niu CC; Chen WJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Oct; 24(8):613-8. PubMed ID: 19481845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biological fixation of endosseous implants.
Franchi M; Fini M; Martini D; Orsini E; Leonardi L; Ruggeri A; Giavaresi G; Ottani V
Micron; 2005; 36(7-8):665-71. PubMed ID: 16233979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Observations of bone-cement interface. Optical, immunocytochemical and ultrastructural study.
Paiva ME; Lopes JM; Figuereido JA; Teles JA
Pathologica; 1990; 82(1081):519-22. PubMed ID: 2080095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tissue preparation for high-resolution study of the interface between bone cement and bone.
Linder L
Acta Orthop Belg; 1985; 51(2-3):162-5. PubMed ID: 3901658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Reaction of bone to the acute chemical trauma of bone cement.
Linder L
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1977 Jan; 59(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 319097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of controlled immediate loading and implant design on peri-implant bone formation.
Vandamme K; Naert I; Geris L; Vander Sloten J; Puers R; Duyck J
J Clin Periodontol; 2007 Feb; 34(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 17309592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Low-level laser therapy stimulates bone-implant interaction: an experimental study in rabbits.
Khadra M; Rønold HJ; Lyngstadaas SP; Ellingsen JE; Haanaes HR
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Jun; 15(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 15142095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
