BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7026608)

  • 1. Evaluation of the Repliscan II System for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Woolfrey BF; Fox JM; Quall CO
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Oct; 14(4):408-10. PubMed ID: 7026608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the repliscan system for Enterobacteriaceae identification.
    Woolfrey BF; Quall CO; Fox JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Jan; 13(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 7007430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Experiences with the Analytab system for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Gardner JM; Snyder BA; Gröschel D
    Pathol Microbiol (Basel); 1972; 38(2):103-6. PubMed ID: 4555068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical laboratory evaluation of the automicrobic system Enterobacteriaceae biochemical card.
    Davis JR; Stager CE; Wende RD; Qadri SM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Oct; 14(4):370-5. PubMed ID: 7026606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of three methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Appelbaum PC; Arthur RR; Parker ME; Shugar GL; von Kuster LC; Charache P
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Apr; 1(2):76-81. PubMed ID: 6756905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of multiple-test systems for the presumptive identification of enterobacteriaceae.
    Goldin M
    Am J Med Technol; 1972 Aug; 38(8):288-91. PubMed ID: 4563216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biochemical differentiation of the Enterobacteriaceae with the aid of lysine-iron-agar.
    Johnson JG; Kunz LJ; Barron W; Ewing WH
    Appl Microbiol; 1966 Mar; 14(2):212-7. PubMed ID: 5335386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Catalase test as an aid to the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Taylor WI; Achanzar D
    Appl Microbiol; 1972 Jul; 24(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 4560474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the Repliscan system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Brown SD; Washington JA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1978 Dec; 8(6):695-9. PubMed ID: 370143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accurate automated identification of selected Enterobacteriaceae at four hours.
    Ferraro MJ; Edelblut MA; Kunz LJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Jan; 13(1):151-7. PubMed ID: 7007419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Classification of enterobacteria based on overall similarity.
    Krieg RE; Lockhart WR
    J Bacteriol; 1966 Nov; 92(5):1275-80. PubMed ID: 5924265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of micro-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems in identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Aldridge KE; Gardner BB; Clark SJ; Matsen JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1978 Jun; 7(6):507-13. PubMed ID: 353065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation studies of entero-set 20, API 20E and conventional media systems for Enterobacteriaceae identification.
    Aldridge KE; Hodges RL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Jan; 13(1):120-5. PubMed ID: 7007414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability of early identifications obtained with Enterobacteriaceae-plus biochemical cards in the automicrobic system.
    Barry AL; Badal RE
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Aug; 16(2):257-65. PubMed ID: 6749890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the automicrobic system with API, enterotube, micro-ID, micro-media systems, and conventional methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Kelly MT; Latimer JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Nov; 12(5):659-62. PubMed ID: 7024296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the Sensititre system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Staneck JL; Vincelette J; Lamothe F; Polk EA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Apr; 17(4):647-54. PubMed ID: 6343422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficiency of a multitest system (Enterotube) for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Titsworth E; Grunberg E; Beskid G; Cleeland R; Delorenzo WF
    Appl Microbiol; 1969 Aug; 18(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 4979941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative evaluation of the Eiken and API 20E systems and conventional methods for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
    Castillo CB; Bruckner DA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Oct; 20(4):754-7. PubMed ID: 6490860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laboratory evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Freeman JW; Rowland RW; Overman SB; Goodman NL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 May; 13(5):895-8. PubMed ID: 7016913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the AutoSCAN-3 and Sceptor systems for Enterobacteriaceae identification.
    Woolfrey BF; Lally RT; Quall CO
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 May; 17(5):807-13. PubMed ID: 6345577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.