These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Abdominal wound closure. A comparison of polydioxanone, polypropylene, and Teflon-coated braided Dacron sutures. Kon ND; Meredith JW; Poole GV; Martin MB; Kawamoto E; Myers RT Am Surg; 1984 Oct; 50(10):549-51. PubMed ID: 6237599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of parallel versus perpendicular placement of retention sutures in abdominal wound closure. Rappaport W; Allen R; Chvapil M; Benson D; Putnam C Am Surg; 1990 Oct; 56(10):618-23. PubMed ID: 2221612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tensile strength of surgical knots in abdominal wound closure. Fong ED; Bartlett AS; Malak S; Anderson IA ANZ J Surg; 2008 Mar; 78(3):164-6. PubMed ID: 18269480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Burst abdomen. A preventable complication, monolayer closure of the abdominal incision with monofilament nylon. Mathur SK J Postgrad Med; 1983 Oct; 29(4):223-9. PubMed ID: 6368809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Theory and practice of continuous laparotomy suture (abdominal wound dehiscence and incisional hernia)]. Stelzner F Chirurg; 1988 Oct; 59(10):654-60. PubMed ID: 2973974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Primary mass closure of midline incisions with a continuous running monofilament suture in gynecologic patients. Gallup DG; Talledo OE; King LA Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Apr; 73(4):675-7. PubMed ID: 2648226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Closure of the abdominal wall; how and why? Clinical review. Wadström J; Gerdin B Acta Chir Scand; 1990 Jan; 156(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 2181798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Suture technique and wound-bursting strength. Poole GV; Meredith JW; Kon ND; Martin MB; Kawamoto EH; Myers RT Am Surg; 1984 Oct; 50(10):569-72. PubMed ID: 6385792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stainless steel wire for closure of abdominal operative wounds. Halevy A; Oland Y; Adam YG Am Surg; 1978 Jun; 44(6):342-5. PubMed ID: 354449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Abdominal wound dehiscence. Hugh TB Aust N Z J Surg; 1990 Mar; 60(3):153-5. PubMed ID: 2183750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanical factors influencing the incidence of burst abdomen. Niggebrugge AH; Hansen BE; Trimbos JB; van de Velde CJ; Zwaveling A Eur J Surg; 1995 Sep; 161(9):655-61. PubMed ID: 8541424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Abdominal wound closure. A randomized prospective study of 571 patients comparing continuous vs. interrupted suture techniques. Richards PC; Balch CM; Aldrete JS Ann Surg; 1983 Feb; 197(2):238-43. PubMed ID: 6297417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conventional running suture and continuous double loop closure: an experimental study of wound strength. Cengiz Y; Månsson P; Israelsson LA Eur J Surg; 2000 Aug; 166(8):647-9. PubMed ID: 11003435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Importance of mechanical factors in the development of abdomial wound dehiscence. Tensile strength of the human and animal fascia with regard to various suture-materials]. Tauber R; Seidel W Zentralbl Chir; 1975; 100(19):1178-82. PubMed ID: 132828 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Continuous single-layer anastomoses with monofilament poliglecaprone sutures in abdominal surgery. Samel ST; Heinrich A; Becker H; Post S Eur J Surg; 1999 Jul; 165(7):710-1. PubMed ID: 10452268 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Principles of abdominal wound closure. II. Prevention of wound dehiscence. Sanders RJ; DiClementi D Arch Surg; 1977 Oct; 112(10):1188-91. PubMed ID: 334112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]