These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7028816)

  • 1. The effectiveness of a primer (contact resin) in diminishing marginal leakage of a direct filling resin (Isopast).
    Valcke CF; Austin JC
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1980 Dec; 35(12):825-8. PubMed ID: 7028816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marginal leakage of a microfilled composite resin.
    Hembree JH
    Ark Dent J; 1982 Sep; 53(3):18-9. PubMed ID: 6218797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro marginal leakage of acid-etched composite resin bonded castings.
    Hembree JH; Sneed WD; Looper S
    Quintessence Int; 1986 Aug; 17(8):479-82. PubMed ID: 3529161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro marginal leakage evaluation of a posterior composite resin.
    Hembree JH; Williams JI
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1981 Apr; 61(2):11-3. PubMed ID: 7031369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding.
    Hannig M; Reinhardt KJ; Bott B
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):172-80. PubMed ID: 10530279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
    Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental marginal leakage around Isocap and Compocap S restorations.
    Jodaikin A; Sparrius O
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1980 Dec; 35(12):821-4. PubMed ID: 7028815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro marginal leakage of composite resin restorations using a combination of conventional and microfilled resins.
    Hembree JH; Taylor T
    Quintessence Int; 1985 Dec; 16(12):813-5. PubMed ID: 3868782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Influence of contamination of dental enamel decalcified by acid, on retention of composite resin restoration].
    Komatsu J; Russo M; Takayama S; Holland Junior C; Sasaki T; Quintella PA
    Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent; 1980; 34(6):476-9. PubMed ID: 7010464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laboratory evaluation of compomers in Class V restorations.
    Chersoni S; Lorenzi R; Ferrieri P; Prati C
    Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9545890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of etchant and bonding agent on the inhibition of secondary caries in composite resin restorations.
    Tanizaki K; Mochizuki A; Kobayashi S; Fukuda K; Staninec M; Inoue K; Tsuchitani Y
    J Osaka Univ Dent Sch; 1981 Dec; 21():145-52. PubMed ID: 7047700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marginal adaptation of Class 5 composite restorations: retention grooves versus enamel and dentin bonding.
    Farid MR; Gomaa HM
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Jul; 41(3):1271-5. PubMed ID: 9497668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A randomized controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective phosphoric-acid etching of enamel.
    Van Meerbeek B; Kanumilli P; De Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Lambrechts P; Peumans M
    Dent Mater; 2005 Apr; 21(4):375-83. PubMed ID: 15766585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. SEM study of a self-etching primer adhesive system used for dentin bonding in primary and permanent teeth.
    da Silva Telles PD; Aparecida M; Machado M; Nör JE
    Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 11572489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro microleakage of etched and rebonded Class 5 composite resin restorations.
    Munro GA; Hilton TJ; Hermesch CB
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(5):203-8. PubMed ID: 9484173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microleakage of composite resin restorations with various etching times.
    Gilpatrick RO; Kaplan I; Roach D
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Aug; 25(8):573-6. PubMed ID: 7568707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An in vitro investigation of marginal leakage using two composite resin restorative systems.
    Martin DW
    J Calif Dent Assoc (1961); 1980 Mar; 8(3):41-6. PubMed ID: 7005244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bite-formed posterior resin composite restorations, placed with a self-etching primer and a novel matrix.
    Bertolotti RL; Laamanen H
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Jun; 30(6):419-22. PubMed ID: 10635278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents.
    Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 11572288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.