121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7029572)
1. Errors of Weinberg's difference method.
Allen G
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1981; 69A():71-4. PubMed ID: 7029572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Parental age, sibship's size, and sibship's sex ratio in twins: a progress report.
Gedda L; Lun MT; Carrega R; Roselli E
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1981; 69A():75-80. PubMed ID: 7301898
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Weinberg's differential rule reconsidered.
Fellman J; Eriksson AW
Hum Biol; 2006 Jun; 78(3):253-75. PubMed ID: 17216800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is Weinberg's method valid?
Bulmer MG
Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma); 1976; 25():25-8. PubMed ID: 1036371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The validity of Weinberg's rule in the East Flanders Prospective Twin Survey (EFPTS).
Vlietinck R; Derom C; Derom R; Van den Berghe H; Thiery M
Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma); 1988; 37(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 3239353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of twinning rates in Japan.
Inouye E; Imaizumi Y
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1981; 69A():21-33. PubMed ID: 7301894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The monozygotic twinning rate: is it really constant?
Allen G; Hrubec Z
Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma); 1987; 36(3):389-96. PubMed ID: 3451647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The current status of Weinberg's differential rule.
James WH
Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma); 1992; 41(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 1488854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Increasing rates of sex-discordant twins no longer correspond to decreasing perinatal mortality rates.
Hartley RS; Hitti J
J Perinat Med; 2008; 36(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 18576932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Why are there more same-sex than opposite-sex dizygotic twins?
Kanazawa S; Segal NL; de Meza D
Hum Reprod; 2018 May; 33(5):930-934. PubMed ID: 29534175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Possible bias associated with the use of Weinberg's rule.
James WH
J Reprod Med; 1974 Nov; 13(5):199. PubMed ID: 4427323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The changing incidence of twinning: one century of Italian statistics.
Parisi P; Caperna G
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1981; 69A():35-48. PubMed ID: 7301895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Termination of menstrual life in mothers of twins.
Philippe P
Hum Biol; 1986 Apr; 58(2):239-50. PubMed ID: 3710464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Multiple and singleton pregnancy: differences between mothers as well as offspring.
Corney G; Seedburgh D; Thompson B; Campbell DM; MacGillivray I; Timlin D
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1981; 69A():107-14. PubMed ID: 7029569
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Some observations concerning the decline of dizygotic twinning rate in France between 1901 and 1968.
Hémon D; Berger C; Lazar P
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1981; 69A():49-56. PubMed ID: 7301896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The possibility of a flaw underlying Weinberg's differential rule.
James WH
Ann Hum Genet; 1976 Nov; 40(2):197-9. PubMed ID: 1035073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Difference in plasma bilirubin concentration between monozygotic and dizygotic newborn twins.
Ebbesen F; Mortensen BB
Acta Paediatr; 2003 May; 92(5):569-73. PubMed ID: 12839286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Twins in the biological and medical aspects].
Hankiewicz J; Dudała T
Wiad Lek; 1988 Oct; 41(19):1297-301. PubMed ID: 3073582
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Maternal and environmental factors affecting twin births in Canadian cities.
Elwood JM
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1978 May; 85(5):351-8. PubMed ID: 565648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Role of paratypical factors in determining human multiple pregnancy. I. A comparative statistical analysis of the social biology characteristics of the mothers].
Ivanov VP
Genetika; 1982 Dec; 18(12):2044-9. PubMed ID: 6218012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
