These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7034910)

  • 1. Clinical evaluation of composite and amalgam posterior restorations: one year results.
    Derkson GD; Richardson AS; Waldman R
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1982 Jan; 48(1):45-7. PubMed ID: 7034910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of composite resin and amalgam posterior restorations: three year results.
    Derkson GD; Richardson AS; Waldman R
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1984 Jun; 50(6):478-80. PubMed ID: 6378338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of composite resin and amalgam posterior restorations: two year results.
    Derkson GD; Richardson AS; Waldman R
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1983 Apr; 49(4):277-9. PubMed ID: 6344966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preventive resin restorations vs. amalgam restorations: a three-year clinical study.
    Cloyd S; Gilpatrick RO; Moore D
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1997 Oct; 77(4):36-40. PubMed ID: 9520761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Composite resin-amalgam compound restorations.
    Franchi M; Trisi P; Montanari G; Piattelli A
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Aug; 25(8):577-82. PubMed ID: 7568708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Clinical evaluation of composite restorations on the posterior teeth after 4 years].
    Prati C; Montanari G
    Minerva Stomatol; 1987 Oct; 36(10):765-9. PubMed ID: 3480412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Marginal fractures and corrosion of amalgam restorations. A 3-year report of an experimental clinical study on the reactions of amalgam restorations].
    Letzel H
    Rev Belge Med Dent; 1978; 33(4):343-62. PubMed ID: 291076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of restorative material on the survival rate of restorations in primary molars.
    Papathanasiou AG; Curzon ME; Fairpo CG
    Pediatr Dent; 1994; 16(4):282-8. PubMed ID: 7937261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of occlusal marginal adaptation of Class II resin-composite restorations.
    Kreulen CM; van Amerongen WE; Akerboom HB; Borgmeijer PJ; Gruythuysen RJ
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1993; 60(4-5):310-4. PubMed ID: 8258575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two-year clinical evaluation of a proprietary composite resin for the restoration of primary posterior teeth.
    Roberts MW; Broring CL; Moffa JP
    Pediatr Dent; 1985 Mar; 7(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 3857555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A three-year clinical evaluation of composite resin and a high copper amalgam in posterior primary teeth.
    Nelson GV; Osborne JW; Gale EN; Norman RD; Phillips RW
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1980; 47(6):414-8. PubMed ID: 6934175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Clinical evaluation of amalgam restorations].
    Santos JF
    Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent; 1981; 35(4):361-7. PubMed ID: 6947340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conservative interproximal box-only polyacid modified composite restorations in primary molars, twelve-month clinical results.
    Marks LA; van Amerongen WE; Kreulen CM; Weerheijm KL; Martens LC
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1999; 66(1):23-9, 12. PubMed ID: 10360200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Quality of amalgam and composite restorations: a literature review].
    Kroeze HJ; Ruiken HM; Plasschaert AJ
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1986 Oct; 93(10):343-5. PubMed ID: 3468366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Occlusal glass ionomer cermet, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations: a 2-year clinical study.
    Lidums A; Wilkie R; Smales R
    Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 7803005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of Class II combined amalgam-composite restorations in primary molars after 6 to 30 months.
    Holan G; Chosack A; Eidelman E
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1996; 63(5):341-5. PubMed ID: 8958346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Class I and Class II silver amalgam and resin composite posterior restorations: teaching approaches in Canadian faculties of dentistry.
    McComb D
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Jun; 71(6):405-6. PubMed ID: 15955263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The future of dental amalgam].
    Opdam NJ
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2005 Oct; 112(10):373-5. PubMed ID: 16300323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.