These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7036033)

  • 1. Statistical contrast enhancement of subtraction images for radiographic caries diagnosis.
    Gröndahl HG; Gröndahl K; Okano T; Webber RL
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Feb; 53(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 7036033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital subtraction radiography in artificial recurrent caries detection.
    Nummikoski PV; Martinez TS; Matteson SR; McDavid WD; Dove SB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 May; 21(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 1397457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reproducibility in the assessment of caries lesion behaviour: a comparison between conventional film and subtraction radiography.
    Wenzel A; Anthonisen PN; Juul MB
    Caries Res; 2000; 34(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 10867419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computer-assisted subtraction radiography in periodontal diagnosis.
    Gröndahl K
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1987; 50():1-44. PubMed ID: 3321498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiographic spatial frequencies essential to the diagnosis of incipient interproximal lesions.
    Webber RL; Koziol PH
    J Dent Res; 1976; 55(5):805-11. PubMed ID: 1067295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of quantum noise on the detection of incipient proximal caries.
    Okano T; Gröndahl HG; Gröndahl K; Webber RL
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Feb; 53(2):212-8. PubMed ID: 6949125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital subtraction radiography after stannous fluoride treatment for occlusal caries diagnosis.
    Wenzel A; Halse A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Dec; 74(6):824-8. PubMed ID: 1488242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing the performance of storage phosphor plate and Insight film images for the detection of proximal caries depth.
    Crombie K; Parker ME; Nortje CJ; Sanderink GC
    SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):452, 454-6, 458-9. PubMed ID: 20306863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Depth of occlusal caries assessed clinically, by conventional film radiographs, and by digitized, processed radiographs.
    Wenzel A; Fejerskov O; Kidd E; Joyston-Bechal S; Groeneveld A
    Caries Res; 1990; 24(5):327-33. PubMed ID: 2261604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interaction between noise and file compression and its effect on the recognition of caries in digital imaging.
    Janhom A; van der Stelt PF; van Ginkel FC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 10654032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of logarithmic contrast enhancement on subtraction images.
    Versteeg KH; van der Stelt PF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Oct; 80(4):479-86. PubMed ID: 8521113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of conventional intra-oral radiography and computer imaging techniques for the detection of proximal surface dental caries.
    Dove SB; McDavid WD
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 Aug; 21(3):127-34. PubMed ID: 1397467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection and measurement of approximal radiolucencies by computer-aided image analysis.
    Pitts NB
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Sep; 58(3):358-66. PubMed ID: 6592535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vivo study of pixel grey-measurement in digital subtraction radiography for monitoring caries remineralization.
    Carneiro LS; Nunes CA; Silva MA; Leles CR; Mendonça EF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Feb; 38(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 19176648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clarity and diagnostic quality of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs.
    Goga R; Chandler NP; Love RM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 15314002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Further development of a computer-aided image analysis method of quantifying radiolucencies in approximal enamel.
    Pitts NB; Renson CE
    Caries Res; 1986; 20(4):361-70. PubMed ID: 3521862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of clinician agreement during visualization of conventional and digitized bitewing radiographs.
    Kimmes NS; Saini TS; Carroll LR
    Gen Dent; 2006; 54(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 16776410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure.
    Svanaes DB; Moystad A; Larheim TA
    Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of standard and task-specific enhancement of Digora storage phosphor images for approximal caries diagnosis.
    Møystad A; Svanaes DB; van der Stelt PF; Gröndahl HG; Wenzel A; van Ginkel FC; Kullendorff B; Hintze H; Larheim TA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):390-6. PubMed ID: 15070842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial resolution requirements for digitizing dental radiographs.
    Kassebaum DK; McDavid WD; Dove SB; Waggener RG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Jun; 67(6):760-9. PubMed ID: 2740097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.