222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7036983)
1. Is microsurgery necessary for salpingostomy? The evaluation of results.
Winston RM
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1981 Aug; 21(3):143-52. PubMed ID: 7036983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reversal of Kroener fimbriectomy sterilization.
Novy MJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1980 May; 137(2):198-206. PubMed ID: 7377240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surgery of the fallopian tube.
Taylor PJ; Leader A
Int J Fertil; 1984; 29(2):65-72. PubMed ID: 6148319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sensitivity of hysterosalpingography after tubal surgery.
Letterie GS; Haggerty MF; Fellows DW
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1992; 251(4):175-80. PubMed ID: 1386980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Techniques for pelvic surgery in subfertility.
Watson A; Vandekerckhove P; Lilford R
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (2):CD000221. PubMed ID: 10796702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Organ-preserving and reconstructive microsurgery of the fallopian tubes in tubal infertility: still an alternative to in vitro fertilization (IVF).
Schippert C; Hille U; Bassler C; Soergel P; Hollwitz B; Garcia-Rocha GJ
J Reconstr Microsurg; 2010 Jul; 26(5):317-23. PubMed ID: 20195966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Macroscopic tuboplasty: reversal of female sterilization.
Gupta I; Sawhney H; Mahajan U
Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol; 1990 Dec; 16(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 2099726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microsurgery of the fallopian tube: from fantasy to reality.
Winston RM
Fertil Steril; 1980 Dec; 34(6):521-30. PubMed ID: 7004914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The etiology of ectopic pregnancy.
Russell JB
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Mar; 30(1):181-90. PubMed ID: 2953513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microsurgical salpingostomy is not an obsolete procedure.
Winston RM; Margara RA
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1991 Jul; 98(7):637-42. PubMed ID: 1832011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microsurgical repair of the fallopian tubes.
O'Brien BM; Sully L; Jolly HF; Morrison WA
Aust N Z J Surg; 1983 Apr; 53(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 6576766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tubal physiology and microsurgery.
Eddy CA
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1981 Aug; 21(3):129-33. PubMed ID: 7036982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fallopian tube microsurgery.
Bateman BG; Nunley WC; Kitchin JD
Va Med; 1983 Mar; 110(3):171-3, 176. PubMed ID: 6858359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors influencing the outcome of microsurgical tubal ligation reversals.
Seiler JC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Jun; 146(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 6859139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The risk of ectopic pregnancy following tubal reconstructive microsurgery and assisted reproductive technology procedures.
Schippert C; Soergel P; Staboulidou I; Bassler C; Gagalick S; Hillemanns P; Buehler K; Garcia-Rocha GJ
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Mar; 285(3):863-71. PubMed ID: 21947340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microsurgical reversal of tubal sterilization: a report on 1,118 cases.
Kim SH; Shin CJ; Kim JG; Moon SY; Lee JY; Chang YS
Fertil Steril; 1997 Nov; 68(5):865-70. PubMed ID: 9389817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An analysis of factors influencing the outcome of 232 consecutive tubal microsurgery cases.
Singhal V; Li TC; Cooke ID
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1991 Jul; 98(7):628-36. PubMed ID: 1883785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Repeat sterilization reversal.
Wood C
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1991 May; 31(2):166-7. PubMed ID: 1930040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Progress in tubal surgery.
Winston RM
Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1981 Dec; 8(3):653-79. PubMed ID: 7032801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microsurgical reversal of female sterilization: the role of tubal length.
Silber SJ; Cohen R
Fertil Steril; 1980 Jun; 33(6):598-601. PubMed ID: 7380046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]